Results 1 to 10 of 15
Hybrid View
-
04-03-2014, 09:53 PM #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 273
Thanked: 43I tend to agree with Hirlau's theory.
Anyway, Bummer!!
The good thing is you probably got them for less account of the defects.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Galaxy51 For This Useful Post:
Hirlau (04-04-2014)
-
04-03-2014, 10:00 PM #2
knife guys...
don't be offended, you remember before you knew--
you didn't know.Buttery Goodness is the Grail
-
04-04-2014, 03:40 AM #3
-
04-13-2014, 08:44 PM #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Republica de Tejas
- Posts
- 2,792
Thanked: 884Looks to me like a regrind.
After looking at the auction pics, the shoulders of the blades appear to have a finish that matches the edge and the spine.Member Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club, participant SE Asia War Games 1972-1973. The oath I swore has no statute of limitation.
-
04-14-2014, 10:31 AM #5
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 3,816
Thanked: 3164The shoulders look OK to me - it certainly is not 'shoulderless' as the stabiliser (single) is clearly visible.
The blade probably has a double hollow grind, ie a thicker 'belly' just above the top of the bevel line, say 1/3 - 1/4 the way up the razor from the cutting edge.
The running lines of tarnish show that the blades have been kept in an ill regulated place that got cold enough in winter to deposit condensation on the blades, giving the 'bromide drag' (old photographers term) effect to the tarnish. Perhaps someone made an attempt to clean off the tarnish along the belly at some time.
Could just be an effect of the double hollow grind, though - the reflection shown on it would come from another plane to the rest of the blade, so it might just be showing a lined (artexed) ceiling or something like that.
Regards,
Neil