Results 1 to 10 of 14
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: doesn't look right

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Apex NC
    Posts
    535
    Thanked: 90

    Default doesn't look right


  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    17,334
    Thanked: 3228

    Default

    With limited knowledge of very old razors and just as a guess, I would say it could be from that time period. Interested to see what those knowledgeable in the field of very old razors have to say.

    Bob
    Life is a terminal illness in the end

  3. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,321
    Thanked: 498

    Default

    Why on EARTH would they want to sell a family heirloom like that is beyond me!! Keep it in the family and pass it down!!
    What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Apex NC
    Posts
    535
    Thanked: 90

    Default

    I am no expert either. From what I have seen this looks more like a 1775 or newer. That is why I was wondering what others thought. It is way more than I want to spend anyway. I was more interested in the history. They seem to have the provenance, but that doesn't mean it is true or even the same razor.
    BobH likes this.

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,321
    Thanked: 498

    Default

    The only way I would pay that would be if it was from my own family. If it was legit and in my family I would pay 3 times that. Smh
    What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one

  6. #6
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanked: 3164

    Default

    Well the family history looks OK. A member of the family wrote this in the late 1800s:

    Name:  pease ancestry.jpg
Views: 352
Size:  77.1 KB

    The razor looks about right too. This one is from 1612:

    Name:  1612 razor.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  31.1 KB

    This one is from 1670:

    Name:  1670 razor.jpg
Views: 336
Size:  28.0 KB

    and this one is not so accurately dated, but comes from the 17th century:

    Name:  17th c razor 01.jpg
Views: 370
Size:  33.5 KB

    The 1670 one is of particular interest. It is dated 1670 by the artist (this is a small detail of a still-life scene painted by a Dutch artist) but look at the tail - one in the eye for those who try to assign dates by tail shape!

    The tang on the razor in the auction is reminiscent of a French razor (tail-less) but it appears to jut out too far and is a little ragged, so it was probably some kind of stub tail that has been damaged, in my opinion.

    Without a makers mark or name on the actual razor, then all the history and documentation are useless - it might as well be any razor, not necessarily made by a locksmith. The Art of the Locksmith goes back a long, long way. In the 17th century a good locksmith would be asked to provide intricately detailed locks for churches and public buildings, so the art was a thing in its own right, like that of the razorsmith. I can see a blacksmith of this era making razors - the french excelled at this niche, but a locksmith seems to be a bit debateable, though I might be far off the mark here.

    It is a bit like selling a thuringian as an Escher as far as I am concerned - it has to have a name on it.

    Regards
    Neil
    Last edited by Neil Miller; 05-14-2015 at 03:50 PM.

  7. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Neil Miller For This Useful Post:

    BobH (05-14-2015), Crawler (05-16-2015), Hirlau (05-14-2015), markbignosekelly (05-14-2015), Phrank (05-14-2015), RezDog (05-14-2015), silverloaf (05-20-2015), Steel (04-07-2016), Tack (05-18-2015), WW243 (05-14-2015)

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Apex NC
    Posts
    535
    Thanked: 90

    Default

    Well at least it answered part of my question. I did not think that particular blade shape went that far back. I had one with similar shape from known maker. So I know it is not that old, but was trying to date it and came up with 1775 based on the shape and style. So mine may be a bit older than I thought only a few years though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •