I'm not sure so I thought I would ask you.
You all (mostly) seem to be pretty level headed and after the last guy had a blow up over neutral,I thought I might think this through a little.

Let's say you got an item.
There was a poor description stating that the seller didn't know who made it due to a lack of labels.
You ask a question and get " I see these all the time and that's how I know what it is."
You get the item, and it is clearly labeled.
Now, I'm not saying it's a bad item, but the seller said they didn't know who the maker was even though it was clearly stamped in 1/4 inch tall letters and writing covered most of the surface.
BUT if the seller had disclosed the maker you wouldn't have bought it.

So you aren't empty handed, but you have something that you wouldn't have purchased had you known what it was, and are having a real hard time believing that the seller could miss something so obvious.

The label is so clear that a person would have to be blind to miss it, but they claimed it unmarked (actually they specified BOX LID MISSING and did not address marking on the item itself) and you are suspicious that they intentionally omitted information in their description.

never mind which item, this is a discussion of principles

When do you leave negative feedback?