Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 4

    Default Need a quick answer to this vintage question ASAP!

    I HAVE to buy a razor before going to bed here in Illinois. I want a beat up one because I have an urge to try my hand at a couple restores, on the cheap.

    I found three, help me pick one!

    1) HENRYS X Geneva Cutlery

    2) SHEFFIELD

    3) Joseph Smith & Sons

    This is all the info I have on any of these blades, other than the pics.


    QUESTION: Which is the better/rarer/more valuable blade?

  2. #2
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,410
    Thanked: 3906
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    it depends on the condition, more than the make.
    based on the names only i'd get the joseph smith, which is also from sheffield, as they tend to be on the more interesting side of blade design, but if i see them all i may pick another one.

  3. #3
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    http://i.ebayimg.com/00/$(KGrHqUOKiEE12DiV18+BNe9F)MrG!~~0_3.JPG
    joseph smith & sons






    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=300537150788
    geneva cutlery henry x


    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=120701469444
    sheffield

  4. #4
    Know thyself holli4pirating's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    11,930
    Thanked: 2559

    Default

    Maybe it's just me, but the pictures didn't load. Copy and paste of the first shows a razor I wouldn't even consider, given it's photo and apparent condition.

    I like Smiths. And Genevas. And pretty much everything from Sheffield (which includes Smiths).

  5. #5
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    Yes that joseph smith looks like hell, but remember I'm going to throw the scales away and replace with custom, buff the blade...I considered it because theres no rust on the blade and the stamp looks good. (as good as this blurry pic shows) and the things like $12. The sheffield has small rust spots which could possibly reveal some pitting, the geneva cutlery is in much better shape than the rest.

  6. #6
    Know thyself holli4pirating's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    11,930
    Thanked: 2559

    Default

    If a blade is small to start, any width you lose by accident during restoration seems like a lot more steel than it would with a bigger razor. I HATE buffing 4/8 or less blades.

  7. #7
    HLS
    HLS is offline
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    134
    Thanked: 21

    Default

    Not a pro here, but I do have a few razors. Forget the Joseph Smiths. The Sheffield is going to have some pitting as already mentioned. The Geneva seems like the best bet. The handle is broken on it, but like you said it's coming off anyway. I also like the tang on the geneva better.

    Jim

  8. #8
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    92
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    Holli-good advice. I'll learn from your experience and not get a skinny blade-

    HLS-you make a good point. Geneva would be nicest and easiest to clean up-

    gugi-rock on

  9. #9
    what Dad calls me nun2sharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas city area USA
    Posts
    9,172
    Thanked: 1677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by holli4pirating View Post
    I HATE buffing 4/8 or less blades.

    Nothing like a sharp spine to show for all of the work.
    It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •