Results 1 to 10 of 25
Hybrid View
-
10-11-2017, 11:18 PM #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 26
Thanked: 0Thanks for great answers. Allright so 1000x times is not an overkill? im aleready going to buy a good microscope.
-
10-11-2017, 11:28 PM #2
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
- Posts
- 8,023
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2209
-
10-11-2017, 11:32 PM #3
I was going to chime in so I went to the start of this thread and I while I would recommend a good 30 power loupe the most magnification that see was 100.
So I'm wondering where the 1000 power came in (see in Red above). One too many zero when typing
If so it happens to the best of us.Our house is as Neil left it- an Aladdins cave of 'stuff'.
Kim X
-
10-12-2017, 12:40 AM #4
I find X100 to be my go to magnification. It's about as much as you can use and still inspect the whole edge in a reasonably short period of time. X10-30 is very useful, but if X100 is available I would always go to it.
-
10-12-2017, 09:20 AM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- Bucharest
- Posts
- 434
Thanked: 156No need to go over 100x optical magnification for our needs...you just need to see whats going on at the bevels and edge...the amount of info provided under clear magnification from 30x to 100x is more then enough.
The rest can be deduced.
I would worry more about the knowledge needed to interpret the images...as knowledge is of much more value then an image. And interpreting an optical image is most of the time easier then a digitaly enhanced one.
You are not going to get better edges just by looking at them under 1000x...you need to be able to understand what you see and corelate that with your technique...and hones...razor geometry and steel.
A good understanding of an image gets you valuable feedback to adjust your technique...change a hone in the lineup....use tape to modify the angle of honing....understand what the steel can take.....slurry or no slurry...finishing on water...oil etc...and number of laps....pressure of the stroke...and where you apply the pressure...be it at the edge end by torqueing or at the spine...
There are so many variables that need to be understood before going after the ultimate magnification.
Otherwise you'll be just looking at pretty pictures
-
The Following User Says Thank You to ovidiucotiga For This Useful Post:
BobH (10-12-2017)
-
10-12-2017, 09:33 AM #6
30x for me too. I have a 300x usb scope and find it frustrating to use because it gives too much detail. a 30x and some good light tells me what i need to know.
-
10-19-2017, 12:18 AM #7
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Location
- Indiana, Portland
- Posts
- 321
Thanked: 70
-
10-12-2017, 01:43 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
- Posts
- 8,023
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2209At the beginning of this thread the 1000x was mentioned. I also have a metalurgical scope with the capability of 1000x .It is primarily for looking at the grain size/composition/structure of a metal. It is not useful for razors, hence my post.
Frankly I used a 30x handheld scope for many years and it is more than adequate for the task.Randolph Tuttle, a SRP Mentor for residents of Minnesota & western Wisconsin
-
10-14-2017, 12:09 PM #9
I also use a 30x-60x hand held loupe.
I prefer the 60x myself, I can hold it far enough from the blade and not have to have my eye right at the loupe.
Different strokes for different folksLook sharp and smell nice for the ladies.~~~Benz
Imperfection is beauty, madness is genius and it's better to be absolutely ridiculous than absolutely boring ― Marilyn Monroe
-
10-14-2017, 04:13 PM #10
I used to use a 10X jewellers loupe.
Still do every so often.
The last few years I’ve used it if for some reason the resulting edge wasn’t up to snuff.
Most of the time though, I simply hone and test-shave nowadays.
I also bought some USB thingy with hundreds of magnifying power.
Useless shit, that has been tossed out years agoBjoernar
Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years....