View Poll Results: What fraction of the cost of a razor you like to be a function and what cosmetics

Voters
94. You may not vote on this poll
  • 100% function (I don't care how it looks)

    14 14.89%
  • 75% function 25% cosmetics

    52 55.32%
  • 60% function 40% cosmetics

    8 8.51%
  • 50% function 50% cosmetics

    17 18.09%
  • 25% function 75% cosmetics

    2 2.13%
  • 10% function 90% cosmetics

    1 1.06%
  • 100% cosmetics (I don't care if it shavesl)

    0 0%
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member metalhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pennsyvania
    Posts
    88
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    100% function if it looks good but wont shave whats the point, and if it shaves good why does appearance or brand matter

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    I'm a noob and use a wapi. It seemed that most thought they are good shavers, and it was relatively cheap. I wanted to start out modest but not so modest that I got discouraged by an impossible-to-shave-with razor. I will say that aesthetics played zero part in my decision for this first razor.

    -graham
    Last edited by grahamule; 09-18-2008 at 01:09 PM.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    86
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    Dude, it's been about a month. I'm looking for a great shave right now. Later, when I'm displaying razors in my shave den, assuming I make one, I might care more about aesthetics.

  4. #4
    I'm your huckleberry stdreb27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    211
    Thanked: 22

    Default

    I'd rather have function than beauty. But what is the deal with spending 100 bucks on a razor, and getting a really crappy plastic handle? Doesn't make sense to me. The cost difference can't be that much. Sell it for 10 dollars more and put a wood handle on it.

  5. #5
    Comrade in Arms Alraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    976
    Thanked: 332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stdreb27 View Post
    I'd rather have function than beauty. But what is the deal with spending 100 bucks on a razor, and getting a really crappy plastic handle? Doesn't make sense to me. The cost difference can't be that much. Sell it for 10 dollars more and put a wood handle on it.

    Point taken but it may cost more than just $10 to make that change, especially if the wood is "exotic" don't you think?

    Al raz.

  6. #6
    ---
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,230
    Thanked: 278

    Default

    I voted 75% function. I wanted to vote 100%, but that would make me a hypocrite, because when I bought my DE I avoided the Merkur Progress because of THAT ugly plastic knob.

    I wonder if there are any equivalent monstrosities in the straight razor world?

    BTW I wouldn't knock the Wapienica. I happen to think it has a special charm of its own.

    Quote Originally Posted by grahamule View Post
    I'm a noob and use a wapi. It seemed that most thought they are good shavers, and it was relatively cheap. I wanted to start out modest but not so modest that I got discouraged by an impossible-to-shave-with razor. I will say that aesthetics played zero part in my decision for this first razor.

    -graham

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Worcester, Massachusetts
    Posts
    86
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by metalhead View Post
    100% function if it looks good but wont shave whats the point, and if it shaves good why does appearance or brand matter
    Ditto.....

  8. #8
    big al alex2363's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    landisville nj 08326
    Posts
    116
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    100 % function at this point because im tight budget, if i wasnt then 75 to 50 ratio for me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •