You know, Bob, it's typically considered incredibly bad style to turn a fact or hypothesis based discussion into a long-distance urination competition.

Pro tip: Your answers will be more accurate and relevant if you read that to which you are replying first.

Case in point: Apropos assemblies, see my first footnote; apropos quality, cf my second footnote. Problem: You were, again, I must add, arguing a point which had never been made.

Now be a good forum member and kindly stop the ad hominem nonsense, will you? It's very unbecoming, you know? KThanks.