Thread: Walmart is Evil

I think the rational by the court was a simple open and shut case. walmart produced the contract and it stated their rights and she signed it and that was the end of it.

Routinely if you are involved in any civil litigation the award is usually punitive damage and non and the non covers medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering and other intangeables. I have never heard of any insurance co or corporation suing an employee to get back benefits paid in a case such as this.

Please see my edit above....


Jordan

Thank you again for your contributions. This thread has been very thought-provoking for me

and once again I'd like to point out that this is a rather common clause, I can't remember the name of it, but almost all health insurance has a caluse of this type in it.

Edit: it's called subrogation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subrogation