Results 1 to 10 of 11
Thread: SRP goods
-
06-16-2008, 06:55 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,034
Thanked: 150SRP goods
Okay, I've been gone for a little while, been a little busy, and I like the new look for the forum. However, the SRP goods has me a little confused. 15 of the 29 clothing items were for women, including a thong?!?!
Now I know that JMS has probably purchased at least 3 of those thongs for himself, but have any more than that been sold? How many female members do we have on the board?
Matt
edit: not that anything is wrong with female members of the board. I'm all for it, but I just don't see many.Last edited by mhailey; 06-16-2008 at 07:01 PM.
-
06-16-2008, 07:05 PM #2Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
06-16-2008, 07:05 PM #3
SSHHH!! No one is supposed to know!
Welcome back Sir! I hope everything is looking up for you.
-
06-16-2008, 07:24 PM #4
Many of the men here are men who aspire to join the pcr men's guild and would like to advertise their methods of hair removal on the clothes of the woman or women in their lives.
Others would like to buy ladies' clothes just in case they ever meet a woman, they'll have something to give them that helps describe their hobbyFind me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage
-
06-16-2008, 09:01 PM #5
-
06-17-2008, 10:16 AM #6
Three products aren't even for humans!
Why stop there? Personally I think there's ample room for crossover products -- I propose an SRP dog thong as something to try. There's a market for sure. Jimbo, Wildtim and the rest of you dog owners? If you really loved your dogs, you'd buy them a thong, tight?
-
06-17-2008, 11:17 AM #7
I just wondered why there's all sorts of SRP mugs but no scuttle.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.
-
06-18-2008, 05:00 PM #8
-
06-18-2008, 05:02 PM #9
-
06-19-2008, 11:34 AM #10
Lee what can I say........... you are growing on me.
The was in response to your post, hence the quote. The next line down was a new sentence aimed at Matt as it is his thread. Sorry for any confusion caused.