Results 1 to 10 of 202

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Photoguy67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Nashville,Tn. USA
    Posts
    71
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pudu View Post
    To me, the disturbing statistic was from the survey done in Atlanta. During a home invasion, the criminal was more than twice as likely to get to the gun before the owner. Ouch.

    For anyone interested, there's another article on gun laws in the NY Times.

    Gun Laws and Crime: A Complex Relationship - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/we...liptak.html?hp
    I have trouble beliveing ANYTHING printed by the New York times as they are (personal opinion) the most liberal anti gun news paper in existence and only print things that support their views no matter how wrong they are.
    Photoguy67

  2. #2
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Photoguy67 View Post
    I have trouble beliveing ANYTHING printed by the New York times as they are (personal opinion) the most liberal anti gun news paper in existence and only print things that support their views no matter how wrong they are.
    Photoguy67
    I didn't want to say this as it would get me in hot water with Pudu again but that is how I see it also!!
    Last edited by JMS; 06-29-2008 at 07:28 PM.

  3. #3
    Mr. Meat Helmet Amyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    475
    Thanked: 26

    Default

    I am all for having the right / privilege (privileged right ) to own firearms and fire crackers as we get closer to July 4th , but

    I would have trouble believing anything said by

    NCPA - Policy Report 176 - Myths About Gun Control

    as their opinions are mostly right wing rhetoric.




    Quote Originally Posted by Photoguy67 View Post
    I have trouble beliveing ANYTHING printed by the New York times as they are (personal opinion) the most liberal anti gun news paper in existence and only print things that support their views no matter how wrong they are.
    Photoguy67

  4. #4
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amyn View Post
    I am all for having the right / privilege (privileged right ) to own firearms and fire crackers as we get closer to July 4th , but

    I would have trouble believing anything said by

    NCPA - Policy Report 176 - Myths About Gun Control

    as their opinions are mostly right wing rhetoric.
    Who would you suggest then?

  5. #5
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amyn View Post
    I am all for having the right / privilege (privileged right ) to own firearms and fire crackers as we get closer to July 4th , but

    I would have trouble believing anything said by

    NCPA - Policy Report 176 - Myths About Gun Control

    as their opinions are mostly right wing rhetoric.
    Will you accept this:Can Gun Control Reduce Crime? Part 1

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    448
    Thanked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMS View Post
    Pretty hard-core libertarian, and therefore suspect.

    No information seems to be available on their funding.

    j

  7. #7
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nord Jim View Post
    Pretty hard-core libertarian, and therefore suspect.

    No information seems to be available on their funding.

    j
    How about this, just to add a little more fuel...
    Interview with John Lott, author of More Guns, Less Crime

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    448
    Thanked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JMS View Post
    How about this, just to add a little more fuel...
    Interview with John Lott, author of More Guns, Less Crime
    You need to bear in mind the statistical "confounding variable." That's the often outlying factor that may not have been considered that renders the hypothesis suspect.

    In this case, he cites data from 1977 to 1994. The confounding variable in that time period is that the Baby Boom generation passed through the primary violent crime-committing years. All violent crime decreased in those years for that reason.

    Doesn't disprove his theory, but renders his assertions unproven.

    j

  9. #9
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    I guess we should through common sense out the window, which suggests the higher the possible consequence to the "act", the less likely someone will commit the "act"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •