Results 1 to 10 of 202
Hybrid View
-
06-29-2008, 07:14 PM #1
-
06-29-2008, 07:17 PM #2
-
06-29-2008, 07:52 PM #3
I am all for having the right / privilege (privileged right
) to own firearms and fire crackers as we get closer to July 4th , but
I would have trouble believing anything said by
NCPA - Policy Report 176 - Myths About Gun Control
as their opinions are mostly right wing rhetoric.
-
06-29-2008, 09:09 PM #4
-
06-29-2008, 09:46 PM #5
Will you accept this:Can Gun Control Reduce Crime? Part 1
-
06-29-2008, 11:45 PM #6
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 448
Thanked: 50
-
06-30-2008, 12:26 AM #7
How about this, just to add a little more fuel...
Interview with John Lott, author of More Guns, Less Crime
-
06-30-2008, 12:33 AM #8
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 448
Thanked: 50You need to bear in mind the statistical "confounding variable." That's the often outlying factor that may not have been considered that renders the hypothesis suspect.
In this case, he cites data from 1977 to 1994. The confounding variable in that time period is that the Baby Boom generation passed through the primary violent crime-committing years. All violent crime decreased in those years for that reason.
Doesn't disprove his theory, but renders his assertions unproven.
j
-
06-30-2008, 12:42 AM #9
I guess we should through common sense out the window, which suggests the higher the possible consequence to the "act", the less likely someone will commit the "act"