Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

    Default Taxing Money More Than Once

    I've seen a number of posts expressing criticism about the idea of money being taxed more than once, often in discussions about whether the inheritance tax is unfair because the government is taxing the money when it is income to the wage earner, and when it passes to the earner's heirs upon his or her death.

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but doesn't the government routinely tax money "more than once"? For example, the money I earn through working is initially subject to a number of different taxes (income, social security, etc.). My after-tax income is taxed again when I go out and spend it on a variety of items. For example, if I buy a car with my already-taxed earnings, I have to pay state and federal taxes on my purchase, so that same money has now been taxed twice. Same thing if I use the money to buy anything from baseball tickets to a house. It's taxed coming in and going out, so to speak.

    So, tell me, where does the idea come from that money can only being taxed once?

  2. #2
    Affable Chap Nickelking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fullerton, CA
    Posts
    544
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    It was the idea behind the boston tea party and all the protests of the stamp act for starters.

    and many feel that those taxes you listed are illegal because of that. I know there's language in one of our founding documents to that effect, but am too lazy to find it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,301
    Thanked: 267

    Default

    You are right about taxing more than once but there are worse taxes. How about this one? In California you pay a tax based on a federal tax and the price of the gasoline. California then taxes you on the total for the gallon which includes the Federal tax, thus you are paying a tax not for a product but for a tax levied by the Federal government. We are still 14 Billion dollars in debt.


    Nice HUH?

    Richard

  4. #4
    Cheapskate Honer Wildtim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A2 Michigan
    Posts
    2,371
    Thanked: 241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riooso View Post
    You are right about taxing more than once but there are worse taxes. How about this one? In California you pay a tax based on a federal tax and the price of the gasoline. California then taxes you on the total for the gallon which includes the Federal tax, thus you are paying a tax not for a product but for a tax levied by the Federal government. We are still 14 Billion dollars in debt.


    Nice HUH?

    Richard
    Gasoline cigarettes, and liquor are all worse than that. They are taxed by both the feds and the state before you see the price tag upon which you pay a sales tax and in some places a special liquor tax or other sin tax. So on gas you are charged sales tax on the money the state itself is charging in tax. Or the state taxes you to pay the feds a tax and also taxes you to pay them a tax. Its a tax payment tax.

    The last time I heard a figure on cigarettes the price producers charge hadn't gone up since the seventies, the only thing causing the price to rise was taxes.

    Here in Michigan there is a legal minimum set by the state that must be charged for liquor, while not a tax it is a way they screw money out of our pockets that would be completely abhorrent to the founders of this nation.

    We also have to pay income tax on the money we get as an income tax refund. They take to much from our paycheck in the first place then they tax it as income when they give the overage back, figure that one out.
    Last edited by Wildtim; 07-04-2008 at 04:15 AM.

  5. #5
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billyjeff2 View Post
    So, tell me, where does the idea come from that money can only being taxed once?
    from people who are overtaxed
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  6. #6
    Dapper Dandy Quick Orange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    2,437
    Thanked: 146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildtim View Post
    We also have to pay income tax on the money we get as an income tax refund. They take to much from our paycheck in the first place then they tax it as income when they give the overage back, figure that one out.
    No way?! I'd love to take that one to court

  7. #7
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick Orange View Post
    No way?! I'd love to take that one to court
    Oklahoma does it
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  8. #8
    Troublemaker
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Modena, Italy
    Posts
    901
    Thanked: 271

    Default

    My theory is that taxation is a mechanism established by the rich (i.e., those with capital to invest) to extract money from the poor. It works like this: every investment has a certain amount of risk that you will not be paid back. The safest investment is to loan money to the government, which is required to pay by law. The government sells debt to investors in the form of bonds and implements taxes to pay the interest on the bonds. The taxes hit wage earners much harder than investors. The investors take the interest earned from the government and buy more bonds. It's a money pump that takes money from wage earners and puts it in the pockets of investors.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    448
    Thanked: 50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick Orange View Post
    No way?! I'd love to take that one to court
    It's because the withholding is taken out pre-tax, so it becomes taxable when it is refunded.

    j

  10. #10
    Affable Chap Nickelking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fullerton, CA
    Posts
    544
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nord Jim View Post
    It's because the withholding is taken out pre-tax, so it becomes taxable when it is refunded.

    j
    But the federal tax charged for that year is on pre-tax dollars, your withholding has no bearing on your gross taxable income. (it's the same in California btw)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •