Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 148
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Palin's Choice for VP

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Seattle Wa.
    Posts
    58
    Thanked: 10

    Default

    Anyone who thinks we have anyone left-wing running for office doesn't know what the word means. Obama is not left wing, and as a person over 50 years old I can't recall anyone that is left-wing ever being a nominated for the office of the President. I believe McCain's choice for V.P shows how desperate he is to get any press no matter how short lived. He only met her once before the nomination, who is running his campaign, I thinks he loks very uncomfortablle with her, as we all should be.

  2. #12
    Senior Member denmason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tracy, Ca
    Posts
    512
    Thanked: 122

    Default

    I think McCain has made a foolish mistake with this choice. As far as I'm concerned, he has disqualified himself as a serious candidate for our highest office. Palin is a VERY right wing conservative and VERY anti-choice. She has done a good job running Alaska, but she is nowhere near being qualified to be VP. McCain chose her as a means to pick up the Hillary voters. The media is on the way to picking this woman to shreds. I'm very sure that there are many other women out there that have worked very hard and that would be far more a better choice than Palin. McCain has underestimated women's intelligence and will lose their vote. As I see it, McCain has committed political suicide.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    852
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kmag View Post
    Anyone who thinks we have anyone left-wing running for office doesn't know what the word means. Obama is not left wing, and as a person over 50 years old I can't recall anyone that is left-wing ever being a nominated for the office of the President. I believe McCain's choice for V.P shows how desperate he is to get any press no matter how short lived. He only met her once before the nomination, who is running his campaign, I thinks he loks very uncomfortablle with her, as we all should be.
    I would argue that your definition of "left wing" is a little off from that currently in use...
    I'm not accusing any of the candidates of being a Montagnard after all. They are still almost all (IMHO) left wing. What can the Government Do for YOU? We assure you, we'll only tax rich people to pay for it... All modern left-wing stances.

    Another thing to consider...if at least ONE of the candidates isn't *extremely* distasteful to you and your views...it's a good bet the opposite side of the spectrum isn't represented in this election, likewise vice versa if at least one isn't appealing.

    John P.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JohnP For This Useful Post:

    Brother Jeeter (09-01-2008), jockeys (09-02-2008)

  5. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    Maybe McCain hopes Palin's looks will attract the maile vote.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  6. #15
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Her highest degree, a BA, is in journalism, thus her lack of awareness of what role the VP plays. Her journalistic endeavors were limited to sports, again suggesting a reason for not knowing the role of the VP. While a Senator does not govern, Senators are constantly exposed to the entire workings of government. Also, the executive branch has to work closely with (aka shmooze) Congress and a former Senator will have a better chance at doing that. At least a Senator knows how the Washington scene actually functions. Despite all the claims of superiority of Washington outsiders, it's the insiders who get the back-door deals made and that's how our government functions.
    Moose-hunting skills do not get agendas moved forward.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:

    billyjeff2 (09-01-2008)

  8. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    448
    Thanked: 50

    Default

    Palin's selection amounts to a Hail Mary pass -- in the first quarter, no less. It's a desperation move.

    I suspect that she was jammed down McCain's throat by the party orthodoxy -- just as Dan Quayle was forced on ol' H.W 20 years ago. If you recall, Bush 41 was also considered insufficiently "conservative" by the people who really run the party, and just as obviously, Quayle wasn't his choice.

    I do think McCain deserves more respect from his own party.

    j

  9. #17
    Senior Member freebird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanked: 161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by denmason View Post
    I think McCain has made a foolish mistake with this choice. As far as I'm concerned, he has disqualified himself as a serious candidate for our highest office. Palin is a VERY right wing conservative and VERY anti-choice. She has done a good job running Alaska, but she is nowhere near being qualified to be VP. McCain chose her as a means to pick up the Hillary voters. The media is on the way to picking this woman to shreds. I'm very sure that there are many other women out there that have worked very hard and that would be far more a better choice than Palin. McCain has underestimated women's intelligence and will lose their vote. As I see it, McCain has committed political suicide.
    She may not be experienced enough for veep, but I don't believe Obama is nowhere near being experienced enough for President either. I'd rather have an inexperienced Veep than an inexperienced Prez. Of course the Obama media is going to try to pick her to pieces, he's their "chosen one". I think she balances McCain out nicely, as the Repubs were concerned that he wasn't conservative enough, and who wouldn't love a gun toting frontier lady from Alaska?

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to freebird For This Useful Post:

    Joe Chandler (09-08-2008), Mike7120 (09-02-2008), nun2sharp (09-02-2008), stritheor (09-01-2008)

  11. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    448
    Thanked: 50

    Default

    I really don't know where this idea came from that Obama is "inexperienced." True, he's not a Washington insider, but I think everyone will admit that "Washington Insider" is normally considered a negative -- right up to the point where the "insider" is one's own choice. We're all guilty of that.

    Obama has a long, successful history, in community organizing, state government, law, and teaching, and lest we forget, he's running a stunning campaign. He faced off with the "inevitable" winner, a senator with a huge organization, lots of friends, and lots of money, and he took her to school. This is a guy who gets things done.

    I'd suggest that anyone with questions should read "Dreams From My Father." It tells a lot about who he is and what he is. Did you know that he's probably to the right of most Republicans on the issue of personal responsibility?

    As far as Palin is concerned, she's only there for the demographic. Her job is to calm down the ultra-right and perhaps draw a few women. She's obviously not McCain's choice -- he's only met her once before, fer crissakes. And we should also remember the two main jobs of the Vice President -- to run the United States Senate, and to take over for the President in the case of death or incapacity.

    Can you really say she's the best they could find for either?

    j

  12. #19
    Member DavidM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    53
    Thanked: 12

    Default Experience.........

    Uh....unless I am mistaken, Barak Obama ran for a uncontested senate seat, has never written any significant law..........and two years later he feels qualified to be the PRESIDENT?

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DavidM For This Useful Post:

    freebird (09-01-2008), Howard Newell (09-03-2008), Mike7120 (09-02-2008), stritheor (09-01-2008)

  14. #20
    < Banned User >
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Coral Springs, Fl
    Posts
    517
    Thanked: 44

    Default

    Ok first... She has fought corruption in her own party and is a normal person... This is a fact. Everyone is always saying that they want someone who is not a billionaire in office who is in touch with the people and that are as honest as a politician can be. This woman exhibits all those qualities en mass. Bush is wealthy, Clinton is wealthy, Kerry was a Forbes and married to the Heinz family for God sake, McCain's wife is wealthy, and Obama, the middle class man of the people who has never held a real job outside education and politics made $4 million last year. Would anyone like to tell me how someone on a senator's salary makes $4 million?

    Second, She is conservative and if you don't like that, well that is your political view so get over it. She is running in a party that likes conservative and that was a thing McCain was lacking. However she is also a maverick and a reformer which fits with McCains history and allows them to work together. She has bucked the American Oil industry in their pipeline deal when that is unthinkable in politics, she has tried to have numerous currupt politicians thrown out of office, she has RAISED taxes on oil companies and caused a major budget surplus. That is something we need right now and yet those are not conservative principals... Yet they are all things Reagan did which is why the conservatives like her anyways.

    Finally to all you you who are on the experience bandwagon and harping on her quip about what does the VP do. THE VP EFFECTIVELY DOES NOTHING IN OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The jobs of the VP are the following. To be the tie breaking vote in the senate, To certify teh official vote of the electoral college, and to take over the duties of president should the president be unable to perform them. Oh and to do whatever other duties the president tells him/her to do.

    THAT IS IT! Really. No kidding. It is the cushiest job in washington. A VP is only really there to get someone elected. In the case of Lindon Johnson, he was an instant lame duck and the only policies he could advance were those championed by JFK. If Obama or McCain were to die then Biden and Palin would be nothing more than a place holder until a new election could be held unless there is a serious crisis.

    And beyond that, wouldn't you rather have your most seasoned players on the field? With Obama, the Junior Varsity squad is the one playing for the title with the Varsity squad on the bench. With McCain, the best player is on the field with the lesser players on the bench learning what they need to be the varsity squad later. Doesn't that make more sense? Palin will have plenty of time to learn foreign policy and washington. She has shown an aptitude and with even a year of being around the presidency from the second seat, she will have more experience that all but the most experienced politicians in Washington.

    Right now she is not ready to be president. That is for sure. But with some time as VP she will be.

    "The presidency does not lend itself to on the job training." -Joe Biden Yet that is what the VP position is best for. So why does the Democrats have their most expericenced guy on the bench and the new guy in the hot seat?

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to The Topher For This Useful Post:

    Dicestone (09-01-2008), Joe Chandler (09-08-2008), loueedacat (09-02-2008), nun2sharp (09-02-2008)

Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •