Thread: Please Help Keep This Person Out Of Washington

Originally Posted by JMS

I see nothing wrong with what she said in the interview! If someone calls me bald and ugly, are they being negative? No, they are being factual, and for someone to come out and claim that they are being negative would be untrue, and to further try and stop such factual remarks by condemning them as negative would border on infringing on the right to free speech by anyone and not just the one who is being unfairly condemned!

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Above is the First Amendment to the Constitution, what dose it have to do with what she was talking about? Did Congress pass a law saying the she can't say bad things about Obama? She said it so she has free speech, the press reported it, and she says this bull over and over at her "somewhat" peaceable rallies? Just another example of her complete and utter ignorance. You thing she would have at least learned the First Amendment while studying journalism. News Flash the Constitution does not protect one from criticism from the press nor anyone else. If you don't want to be criticized stop saying stupid things.

I'm so tired of the total and utter ignorance, education=elitism, "I want to vote for someone as ignorant as me". "It's a dangerous world" so go out and vote for a hot head with very little self control and his ignorant running mate.

Then again maybe I'm wrong, it seems like Palin has her on personal Constitution that gives her rights a powers beyond everyone else.

Originally Posted by Hutch

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Above is the First Amendment to the Constitution, what dose it have to do with what she was talking about? Did Congress pass a law saying the she can't say bad things about Obama? She said it so she has free speech, the press reported it, and she says this bull over and over at her "somewhat" peaceable rallies? Just another example of her complete and utter ignorance. You thing she would have at least learned the First Amendment while studying journalism. News Flash the Constitution does not protect one from criticism from the press nor anyone else. If you don't want to be criticized stop saying stupid things.

I'm so tired of the total and utter ignorance, education=elitism, "I want to vote for someone as ignorant as me". "It's a dangerous world" so go out and vote for a hot head with very little self control and his ignorant running mate.

Then again maybe I'm wrong, it seems like Palin has her on personal Constitution that gives her rights a powers beyond everyone else.

Yep hers includes running the Senate.....

Originally Posted by xman

Wirebeard, I think I'm beginning to like you.

Thanks......

Originally Posted by Nord Jim

But she wasn't even being factual. She claimed that Obama was "palling around with terrorists," which is absurd. She said that there are "American" parts of the country and un-American parts of the country, and that "they" don't "see this country the way I do."

I get very tired of these right-wing extremists -- I won't call them Republicans, because they've essentially highjacked the party of my birth -- slinging mud and worse, and then wrapping themselves in the flag and whining about what victims they are.

j

Lincoln would NOT be a member of the current GOP........

Sarah Palin sure is a feather-ruffler!

Originally Posted by hoglahoo

Sarah Palin sure is a feather-ruffler!

I'd rather her be intelligent instead.

YouTube - Sarah Palin Got Pranked