Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Earmarks

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

    Default Earmarks

    Looks like the Republicans are almost as addicted to earmarks as the Dems they are criticizing for being addicted to earmarks...click here

  2. #2
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billyjeff2 View Post
    Looks like the Republicans are almost as addicted to earmarks as the Dems they are criticizing for being addicted to earmarks...click here
    So noted! And it disgusts me every bit if not more!

  3. #3
    Dapper Dandy Quick Orange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    2,437
    Thanked: 146

    Default

    At least they're not trying to fund volcano monitoring. That's just silly!

  4. #4
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick Orange View Post
    At least they're not trying to fund volcano monitoring. That's just silly!

    Well, actually the whole volcano funding issue was discussed in an article in Scientific American. Turns out it's not such a waste of money as some contend: click here

  5. #5
    Senior Member billyjeff2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    509
    Thanked: 86

    Default

    One other point about earmarks. Depending on which numbers you believe, the total dollar amount of all earmarks constitutes only between 1%-2% of the entire FY budget. So even if all earmarks were eliminated, the proposed '09 budget would be virtually the same as with the earmarks.

    Kind of makes you scratch your head as to why the Republicans are making such a ruckus over the proverbial "drop in the bucket" , particularly when a full 40% of the proposed earmarks are sponsored by ... Republicans!

  6. #6
    Dapper Dandy Quick Orange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    2,437
    Thanked: 146

    Default

    I know, I was being sarcastic. I think it's absurd not to monitor volcanoes.

    This video at 6:30 is exactly my response to Gov. Jindal: Hulu - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: Wed, Feb 25, 2009 - Watch the full episode now.

  7. #7
    French Toast Please! sicboater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    2,852
    Thanked: 591

    Default

    No kidding. If the Yellowstone caldera blew, we'd be looking at extinction. The funny thing is this money includes other natural disasters like stream bed management to prevent floods. You know, the kind that trashed Jindal's own state when a hurricane hit and the resulting tidal surge/rain fall couldn't be contained.

    -Rob

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick Orange View Post
    I know, I was being sarcastic. I think it's absurd not to monitor volcanoes.

    This video at 6:30 is exactly my response to Gov. Jindal: Hulu - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: Wed, Feb 25, 2009 - Watch the full episode now.

  8. #8
    what Dad calls me nun2sharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas city area USA
    Posts
    9,173
    Thanked: 1677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billyjeff2 View Post
    Looks like the Republicans are almost as addicted to earmarks as the Dems they are criticizing for being addicted to earmarks...click here

    Its been that way for quite a while.
    It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •