View Poll Results: Do you prefer Gov sponsored health care ?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes I am happy with the health care system overseen by the government

    40 71.43%
  • No I would prefer a private health care system like that in the USA

    11 19.64%
  • Other, I will explain in my post

    2 3.57%
  • none of the above

    3 5.36%
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 73
  1. #51
    Troublemaker
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Modena, Italy
    Posts
    901
    Thanked: 271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildtim View Post
    Its interesting to note that every time you guys mention having to pay into the system the amounts are about the same as what I pay with my employer provided plan and the costs of that plan are similar as well.
    With the difference that in the US a large number of people are not covered. In the US, if you lose your job, you also lose your insurance.

  2. #52
    Oxi
    Oxi is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    12
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chimensch View Post
    With the difference that in the US a large number of people are not covered. In the US, if you lose your job, you also lose your insurance.
    I have problems with that arrangement and I'll tell you why. When I was 19 I studied at an university and had a small job in the evening (yearly contract). Untill I contracted cancer. I couldn't work and my contract was eventually not renewed.

    The medical bills come no matter you have a job or not. And if you are really sick, you just can't work. I'm quite happy that wasn't a problem for me because I was insured no matter what. Nowadays I'm 26 and one year away of finishing my study and already have joboffers. Future's looking brighter by the day.

    I'm not that familiair with the healthcare system in the US, but I assume I would have lost everything (including my life) by no fault of my own. Or is this incorrect? I even doubt a basic HMO would have covered my expenses.

  3. #53
    Troublemaker
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Modena, Italy
    Posts
    901
    Thanked: 271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxi View Post
    I have problems with that arrangement and I'll tell you why. When I was 19 I studied at an university and had a small job in the evening (yearly contract). Untill I contracted cancer. I couldn't work and my contract was eventually not renewed.

    The medical bills come no matter you have a job or not. And if you are really sick, you just can't work. I'm quite happy that wasn't a problem for me because I was insured no matter what. Nowadays I'm 26 and one year away of finishing my study and already have joboffers. Future's looking brighter by the day.

    I'm not that familiair with the healthcare system in the US, but I assume I would have lost everything (including my life) by no fault of my own. Or is this incorrect? I even doubt a basic HMO would have covered my expenses.
    I don't want to speculate about what happens in a case like yours but I can tell you this:

    In the United States today, of all the homes in foreclosure, half of them are there because the family was bankrupted by a major illness and almost all of them had medical insurance.

  4. #54
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxi View Post
    I'm not that familiair with the healthcare system in the US, but I assume I would have lost everything (including my life) by no fault of my own. Or is this incorrect? I even doubt a basic HMO would have covered my expenses.
    Here in the USA if you have insurance and you are confronted by an illness like that you will be alright for as long as you insurance holds out. You will have additional co-pay. Usually 20% if you have a decent plan. In many cases the specialist or diagnostics may request the co-pay before they do the procedure.

    This also assumes that the insurance company allows whatever treatment is recommended. If they don't you will have to fight them over it unless you have an advocate and either way the outcome is uncertain and your disease is progressing in the meantime. Imagine trying to deal with a bureaucracy while you are ill.

    If you don't have insurance or if it runs out due to your inability to continue working or paying if it isn't employment based you will still be able to get care if you go to an emergency room.

    They legally can't turn you away. OTOH, they can give minimal treatment and get you out of there as soon as they possibly can. I personally witnessed this with two uninsured friends. One who died as a result of inadaquate treatment.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  5. #55
    Senior Member Navaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    340
    Thanked: 53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyHAD;426733,
    . . . they can give minimal treatment and get you out of there as soon as they possibly can..
    Just like any government Health Care System will. those who think otherwise are due for a rude awakening

  6. #56
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Navaja View Post
    Just like any government Health Care System will. those who think otherwise are due for a rude awakening
    Being the original poster of this thread my intention was to poll people outside of the USA on their opinion of gov sponsored health care based on their experience. The last time I looked Florida was not outside of the USA.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  7. #57
    Pogonotomy rules majurey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norf Lahndon, innit?
    Posts
    1,622
    Thanked: 170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildtim View Post
    Its interesting to note that every time you guys mention having to pay into the system the amounts are about the same as what I pay with my employer provided plan and the costs of that plan are similar as well.
    But the comparison is not that simple. NHS provision is driven by non-profit motives. The problem (in my opinion) of the US-type system is that everything is driven by profit motive. It's all private sector. So how would I, as a medic for example, maximise my profit? Why, I'd simply offer the most expensive treatments, and manage care by maximising the amount of my time and expertise required. The outcome seems to be levels of treatment inappropriately OTT.

    This profit motive in healthcare supports everything from the newest most expensive drugs (pharmas cheer) to unnecessary interventions (medics cheer) to peolpes' need to protect themselves against these inflated costs (insurers cheer).

    At some point, the motive for profit comes crashing headlong into the interests of the patient. That is, if you believe in access to good treatment for all. If you believe that health (and other social basics like education) should be tiered like commerce, effectively blocking the poor's access to good treatment (or education), then an entirely privatised health system is as good as any I suppose.

  8. #58
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Navaja View Post
    Just like any government Health Care System will. those who think otherwise are due for a rude awakening
    You're quite mistaken.

    Last year during my wife's pregnancy we were served by a fantastic obstetrician and when my son was born it was in a state of the art hospital with complete care and attention. He was eventually delivered via emergency C-section where two surgeons joined our OB, two anesthetists and a small team of nurses. She was admitted on Thursday and on Sunday they asked her if she felt good about going home. She said no and it was a good thing because the jaundice started to flare and they were able to take care of it right away. They moved us to a private room even though we hadn't signed up for one and rolled in a UV Photo therapy booth where we stayed for another three days. The whole time the nurses were fantastically helpful and doctors visited us regularly to check up on my post operative wife and new son. Now this isn't a life threatening leukemia story or anything, but as a new father let me tell you it was some relief to have such attentive care for my family. I am so thankful to the whole team for what they did for us i can't really express it accurately in words. They were awesome!



    X

  9. #59
    Damn hedgehog Sailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    SW Finland
    Posts
    3,081
    Thanked: 1806

    Default

    Little off topic, but have to ask, because i do not know.

    In the U.S. is it mandatory for the employers to take a health insurance for their workers or does it base on the goodwill, tax reduction or something like that?
    Last edited by Sailor; 07-29-2009 at 03:43 PM. Reason: typos

  10. #60
    Senior Member Pyment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    939
    Thanked: 129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majurey View Post
    My wife's practice has a 'strictly no pharma reps' policy. Those guys come cold calling and sneaking into practices asking for time with the doctors.
    OTOH this is this is the way Drs over here get free samples for their patients. If you get free samples, you have benefited from this system.


    Quote Originally Posted by majurey View Post
    Next thing you know, they're trying to "oil the wheels of commerce" by giving away freebies. And I'm not talking about branded notepads and pens! My wife has personally been offered these things in the past (supposedly 'no strings'):

    - expensive medical equipment, e.g. stethoscopes, pharyngoscopes, sphygmomanometers, etc.
    - all expenses paid travel and board in a 4-star hotel to attend conferences
    - countless dinner invitations (in our early twenties we accepted one invite and the tab at the end was nearly £1000 for 6 people)
    - provision of free consultants to her practice
    - paid-for places on expensive training sessions
    - and much more
    all currently illegal in the US. Things in the US were like this 20 years ago. Even Pens and notepads are no longer allowed here.

    Quote Originally Posted by majurey View Post
    The marketing budgets for pharmas must be sky-high, which has a knock-on effect on the price charged for their drugs. Prices that are paid for by the NHS which gets its money from taxpayers. So my wife and her partners just turn these guys away and instead prescribe according to CLINICAL judgements, as opposed to decisions which might be partly driven by a sense of owing, due to the big juicy greenback sweeteners that are given away.
    I was staying in a hotel once about 15 years ago where a pharma was housing new reps in training. They told me they were being trained in dressing right, what to say to get into offices, to pretend interest in the docs interests, children, achievements, etc.
    Last edited by Pyment; 07-29-2009 at 04:13 PM. Reason: I know this talks about the US, but differences in situations are also pertinent

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •