Thread: Morbid curiosity

Originally Posted by Bruno

I voted no 2 times. I think they are stupid and polarizing, and showing lack of intelligence on the part of the author. But they don't offend me.

I agree if you mean the artist and not the 'author' of the thread..... although there is room for debate there.....

Originally Posted by JimmyHAD

I agree if you mean the artist and not the 'author' of the thread..... although there is room for debate there.....

Brought to the heights and the dropped to the lowest depths.

Thanks Jimmy...I am crushed...

Originally Posted by Bruno

I voted no 2 times. I think they are stupid and polarizing, and showing lack of intelligence on the part of the author. But they don't offend me.

And then some.

I answered "yes".

Whoever made that picture has a perfect right to do so and to publish it if he likes. I reserve my right to say that, whoever he is, he's a d**ned fool and should probably keep his mouth shut in order not to interrupt people who have something useful to say.

Rant over.

goshawk

Originally Posted by Mike Blue

I'm fascinated by the concept that the exercise of free speech should offend Americans. Content, like all art, is subject to interpretation. Like many things, sometimes it's well done, and sometimes it's not.

The exercise of free speech is beautiful. That doesn't mean that the concept expressed can not be offensive.
Examples: White power, Black power, whacko right wigers, whacko left wingers, and anyone who says "I'm just sayin' what I'm sayin'" when you disagree with them...of course you are, you half witted troglodyte...your misguided unclever tautology doesn't MEAN anything. But I digress.....