View Poll Results: Was scraping the Europe missile project a good decision?
- Voters
- 53. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes.
32 60.38% -
No.
18 33.96% -
Who cares?
3 5.66%
Results 1 to 10 of 28
-
09-17-2009, 06:09 PM #1
Obama scraps Bush-era Europe missile shield - do you approve?
President Barack Obama on Thursday scrapped the Bush-era plan for a missile shield to defend Eastern Europe (snip) The Bush-era plan had complicated ties with Russia, which objected to where the shield installations would be built.
Obama scraps Bush-era Europe missile shield - White House- msnbc.com
The Kremlin: Hands off our turf! The White House: Yes sir!
What do you think about this decision?
-
09-17-2009, 06:23 PM #2
If America just focused on herself for a while, we'd be in a much better position. Like keeping useful defense projects like the F22 Raptor and scrapping foreign projects- like wars and stuff.
War time industry does stimulate the economy but... not the way it currently is.
Lets look at England, 50 years ago:
-'Ello old chap!
-'Ello!
-So how bout our Empire? Biggest in the world now...
-Indeed! But it costs so much to maintain and everyone is revolting and rioting.
-Ah! Let us simply retreat to our borders, let them deal with their issues, and play sports that no one else understands or can afford and invent absurd and unnecessary meals to distinguish ourselves as aloof.
-Huzzah! And we shall call said sports Crew, Cricket, Croquet, Polo and Golf; said meals shall be called Tea, Elevenses, High Tea and so forth.
-Good show old chap!
-Rather!
50 years later, England is sitting pretty with the most powerful currency in the world, and has few greater concerns other than missing tea time or who won the Henley.
The US can be the next England. Yes we can!
-
09-17-2009, 06:35 PM #3
Disclaimer: I am a Czech living in the US who was born behind the iron curtain. I dread the increasing appetite of the Kremlin to have its fingers in European affairs again.
For me, this was a bad decision: Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate who lost to Obama in 2008, blasted the move as "seriously misguided" and said it would fray ties with Eastern European nations that "are increasingly wary of renewed Russian adventurism."
A few months ago, the former leaders of anti-communistic opposition sent an open letter to Obama about their worries regarding his policy towards Russia. Their bad dream just came true.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/wo.../17europe.html
This is a sad day for me and many people from Central and Eastern Europe who believed that US could be a strong ally who would secure stability and neutrality in the region. I'd better work on my Russian again now.
-
09-17-2009, 07:00 PM #4
-
09-17-2009, 07:08 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Stay away stalker!
- Posts
- 4,578
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 1262Palin is watching for the missles from her house, dont worry.
/I am so sorry. It just popped in my head.
-
09-17-2009, 07:17 PM #6
For those of us old enough to remember the "star wars" missile shield is a Reagan era program that the US wasted enough on to probably get health care off to a good start. Unlike national health insurance the missile shield program won't really work anyhow except to line the pockets of the military industrial complex. Unfortunately it is still going forward but on board ships.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
09-17-2009, 07:40 PM #7
Take consolation that on ships it can be moved around, and be useful to us here in America. Putting up a missile network in Europe doesn't really help the US at all. There is actually an airborne missile defense system in the works (that has probably been scrapped along with the rest of the air force, which is ridiculous... I'm not big on standing armies but we should at least have the tech to raise an arm if need be) which would only require a few boeings with big lasers in them.
-
09-17-2009, 07:44 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 35
Thanked: 1Sure do.
Don't sweat the small stuff. What diff does it make when USSR controls(rules) europe? What diff does it make when China controls(rules) asia?
What diff does it make when Islam(naughty) rules Mid-East? What diff does it make when carib/sud america embargos US?
Hows the Favre doin'?
-
09-17-2009, 10:49 PM #9
Sorry but we're not the worlds cop and we can't afford to protect everyone in the world from every imaginable fear. We need to choose what we do very carefully.
No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to thebigspendur For This Useful Post:
Bruno (09-18-2009), LX_Emergency (09-26-2009), majurey (09-18-2009)
-
09-17-2009, 10:56 PM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 1,486
Thanked: 953I'm a hawk and republican, but that always struck me as a silly way to both spend tons of money we don't have, inflame tensions with Russia gratuitously and add little security. If we and Russia start lobbing missiles at each other or each others' allies, the party is over and the next president and premier will be ****roaches.
Jimmy, I haven't heard the phrase "military industrial complex" in two decades! Thanks for bringing me back to my college days for a moment!