Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,068
    Thanked: 13249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Milton Man View Post
    Saw this article in the Washington Post online, and thought it might spur a good debate - whether or not he deserved the award is a moot point, as far as I'm concerned - what interests me here is whether, legally, he's allowed to accept it.

    washingtonpost.com

    The relevant sections of the U.S. constitution states that: Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, clearly stipulates: "And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."

    So, given this, was Obama allowed to accept the award? In light of this, should he politely return it? I find this kind of minutia interesting...

    Mark

    Pretty much a moot point after that statement... Just adding another muddy boot print upon the face of the Constitution of the Untied States of America... No biggy there are plenty there already....
    Last edited by gssixgun; 10-16-2009 at 05:44 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •