Quote Originally Posted by northpaw View Post
Science: a systematic refining of humanity's understanding of the physical workings of the universe that builds on the peer-reviewed work of others. Claims made are falsifiable and tests that support them are repeatable.

Pseudoscience: anything that tries to appear scientific but isn't. Claims are often either unfalsifiable or not subject to peer review. May include attempts to discredit actual science/scientists.
I like your statements about falsifiability, but tell me more. What does the falsifiability of claims have to do with science or pseudoscience? And what counts as "systematic"? What do you mean when you say "systematic"? - Those are two different questions.

Your definition of pseudoscience, though, seems... not fully developed. You are correct, but your statement is circular. I also would ask that we move away from statements about discrediting or who is trying to discredit who. We are not talking about actual people or who is credible, but, rather, what is science, what is pseudoscience, and what is the difference.

Think hard, fellow forum members! That is my challenge. (<- What a statement to wrap up my 3000th post!)