Thread: Respect vs. Blasphemy

X I take issue with many of the assumptions they use to rank countries. I can't accept their rakingings as meaningful in any way. Even given that they only consider religion to have an effect to the level it drives governmental policy. In other words people beiong religios has nothing to do with the level of violence a country suffers but only the level to which organised religion interferes with the operation of the government and the freedom of the people to make their own choices.

Originally Posted by 59caddy

i do not understand not being able to teach ones students about the holocaust. it is a part of world history, albeit a very sad and dark side of anyones history lesson. nevertheless it needs to be taught so we as mankind do not let that kind of massacre and general wholesale murder take place again

+1

I don't see how the holocaust is related to blasphemy.

My view on your question is that no-one and nothing AUTOMATICALLY deserves respect.


Respect has to be earned. Simple as that. And whether or not it's given is an entirely different matter.

At the same time I think it's foolish to go out of your way to insult someone's religion. But there's no law against foolishness.

Do as you would be done by. If you want people to respect you, you should respect them.

Its a two way street.

OTOH, one religious group should not be able to place demands on another group and force them to acquiesce to their demands. People should absolutely be taught about the holocaust and the crusades. If we forget these events there is a chance they could happen again.

Any sort of law, like a blasphemy law, stifles free speech. An atheist would not be able to join a debate as this could be taken as blasphemous (denial of God) and would therefore be illegal. Sorry, but thats not on. You cant censor history and peoples opinions on the world just to avoid causing anyone any offence.

I personally think alot of these sorts of laws are politcal correctness gone mad. Its politicians tripping over themselves to flash their PC credentials and show that they are more inclusive than the other guy.

Frankly I think if they left us all alone we'd muddle along just fine. Its only the hardline extremists and crazy PC politicians who make things difficult for the other 99% of the world.

Originally Posted by xman

I believe you have misinterpreted this comment. They wrote:


and you infer they mean:



I think what the commentator claims is that some, not all Christians have misinterpreted this passage to justify antisemitism, not that this passage proves Christianity is the root of antisemitism. A subtle, but important distinction.

You are correct.

In related news:

Isn't atheism itself anti-semitic?

It's also anti-Christian, anti-muslim, etc etc....

Originally Posted by xman

There can be little doubt of this in the light of the data from the Global Peace Index. The more fundamentally religious a nation is, the more violent they are. The highly secular nations enjoy peace more than all others.

YouTube - Peace Is Non Theistic - Statistical Data

I am sad to admit that the facts will again be dismissed by those who find it in conflict with their dogma.