I am all for doing the research to find a cure. I do not see the moral implications. The problem with the naysayer argument (unfortunately a religion-backed one which means there will inevitably be blind followers) is just a result of people being afraid of the unknown. Could this one day lead to such advanced developments such as cloning? Maybe. But I'd draw the line well before that, and not for moral reasons. For economic, sustainment, global population reasons. Oh and because anybody with lots of money could clone him/herself a million times and take over the world


Sorry for taking that jab at "religion" again, but we know there is skepticism in the "Church" and so I feel it's very pertinent to the way some people may answer the poll question.