Results 11 to 20 of 36
-
01-27-2010, 01:35 AM #11
Reminds me of George Carlin's routine on "euphemisms". This is even more ridiculous, though. It will lead to stupidity, preventing kids from reading because they might find something that makes administrators/skittish parents "uncomfortable." Makes me embarrassed to be a Yank, lunacy like this!
-
01-27-2010, 01:59 AM #12
I guess, technically, we do need a definition for oral sex.
-
01-27-2010, 02:01 AM #13
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In your attic, waiting for you to leave
- Posts
- 1,189
Thanked: 431No doubt Bill Clinton can help.
-
-
01-27-2010, 02:56 AM #14
Like a person (kid) needs a dictionary to get a definition to a word or phrase like that. A lot of kids with older siblings are going to hear this stuff without WEBSTERS help. Please. Reminds me of the sex-ed hoopla I went through in junior h.s.
-
01-27-2010, 03:00 AM #15
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Yonkers, NY however, born and raised in Moultrie,GA!
- Posts
- 554
Thanked: 151
-
The Following User Says Thank You to treydampier For This Useful Post:
ControlFreak1 (01-28-2010)
-
01-27-2010, 03:05 AM #16
Most of those fifth graders are already doing it from what I read in the papers. How about the SRP forum censors..... can anyone say Alfred Hitch**** and get away with it.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
01-27-2010, 03:59 AM #17
What we need is a good old fashioned witch hunt... or maybe a simple book burning
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
01-27-2010, 04:53 AM #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- manchester, tn
- Posts
- 938
Thanked: 259
-
The Following User Says Thank You to 59caddy For This Useful Post:
ControlFreak1 (01-28-2010)
-
01-27-2010, 12:19 PM #19
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 3,490
Thanked: 1903
-
01-27-2010, 12:42 PM #20
The thing that makes me laugh here is that on the one hand theres people banning the dictionary because of smutty word definitions, and then theres all these requests by various bodies and institutions here in the UK to start sex education at age seven and to teach kids about "alternatives" to sex and so on...
I wish they'd get the message straight. Either you want kids to know about these things, in which case keep the dictionaries, or you don't, in which case stop teaching them about sex before they're even into double digits age wise.
-