Results 21 to 30 of 86
Thread: America Rising
-
03-15-2010, 07:11 PM #21
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369Has it been established that as long as government can somehow establish that a system doesn't work, then government is fully justified in taking over? Sounds like a recipe to destroy freedom if ever there was one.
Also, if unpayable credit card debt is stupid, how stupid is the further increased unpayable debt created by another government entitlement program called national health care?
Enormously stupid.Last edited by honedright; 03-15-2010 at 07:26 PM.
-
03-15-2010, 07:13 PM #22
When they start becoming active in the city councils and then start working their way up into the county, state, and federal echelons the will have the government that they desperately need instead of the government they keep whining about. Change for the better will take involvement.
It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain
-
03-15-2010, 09:18 PM #23
-
03-15-2010, 09:36 PM #24
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19
-
03-15-2010, 10:01 PM #25
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369Name one U.S entitlement program that has not gone into enormous debt and is not facing bankruptcy. Why would a national health care program be any different?
Why do we need another option? We have in the U.S. over 1200 health insurance companies, plus Medicare. What's one more "option" going to do other than create more spending?
I don't understand why some people believe that government management is the solution to social ills when all throughout history it has proven itself to be just the opposite.Last edited by honedright; 03-15-2010 at 10:04 PM.
-
03-15-2010, 10:11 PM #26
Well, someone has to do something. And the private industry has shown zero interest in making healthcare affordable again. If noone does anything, care provision will remain rotten and families will continue to be bankrupted by medical conditions, putting further strain on the economy.
Then again, it could just be that if you eliminate the army of lawyers and the insurance companies from the issue of simply providing care, the end result is much cheaper.Last edited by Bruno; 03-15-2010 at 10:14 PM.
Til shade is gone, til water is gone, Into the shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath.
To spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day
-
03-15-2010, 11:14 PM #27
People will agree with you here, but even this is difficult, although noble in its essence:
- Capping the damages paid to victims of malpractice and what not? What if it actually doesn't cover someone's damages. Rendering someone incapable of earning a living has a significant impact on someone's life.
- Capping the policies for these malpractice insurances? Doctors will request even more tests and will likely feel less inclined to take in 'risky' patients due to the limited coverage.
- Removing lawyers from such cases and replacing it with something like a hearing board of medical pros? Doesn't even have a hint of mixed interests, completely reeks of it. And what about the right to the best representation of one's interests?
Once again, the whole circus with expensive support in the courtrooms and what not is not desirable, but even this is a complex thing to rework.
-
03-16-2010, 12:01 AM #28
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19If you're worried about money then you should be complaining about our military spending. Not about spending money on keeping the citizens healthy.
Uh because a lot of people can't get private insurance. It's very expensive.
Private insurance will just continue to raise prices.
-
03-16-2010, 12:10 AM #29
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369
-
03-16-2010, 02:12 PM #30
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19