Results 1 to 10 of 14
Thread: Global Warming rant (be advised)
Hybrid View
-
02-21-2006, 12:40 AM #1
Global Warming rant (be advised)
The idea behind global warming is that the "green house" gasses are trapping certain lightwaves from the sun that increase heat into the atmosphere without the ability to bounce back out after hitting the planet, much like insulation in a cooler traps in the cold or a polar bear's fur traps in body heat.
people who disagree with global warming argue that we've been having milder temperatures down south than we have in a long time and thus that's evidence that global warming isn't happening.
I'm neither liberal nor conservative but here's an experiment for the doubtful, take the largest cooler you can find. stick a thermometer on each side close to but above where the 'other ingredients' will top off at. and put one on the lid centered inside the cooler also. one one side put a small bag of ice, on the otherside put a pot of boiling hot water. If you got the equipment to get really fancy, the thermometers will be digital with lines going to external readouts. otherwise just check the temp every 20 to 30 minutes on each one. and write them down.
What you should find is that the hot side cools off as the cold side is warming up. It's a natural occurance. Depending on the size of your cooler you should see varying temperatures in the middle that initially reflect the heat from the hot pan then start to cool some.
As the ice melts in the northern and southern hemispheres it gives off cold gasses into the air in addition to sending colder waters into the lakes and oceans. Our lakes and oceans act as insulators and when they're cooled down, the rest of the world 'cools down' also. So the initial impact of global warming isn't blistering heat, it's initially milder and milder temperatures over all in the warmer zones with temperatures slowly warming in the colder regions. Eventually the temperatures will even out and THEN (if there's anything left of us and the rest of the world) things should start taking a steady hike upward. But of course the ozone is being eaten away as well so this allows for blistering hot spots as it allows deadly radiation in from the sun that gets trapped by the green house gasses. So, maybe we will get our death by fire without having to have a nuclear haulocost.
Personally I think all the rich mongers of the world will get into a big fight and pull their puppet strings attached to the religiously political world leaders and we'll have nukes flying everywhere and the entire world will be obliterated, thus saving us the worry about global warming.
-
02-21-2006, 02:53 AM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 87
Thanked: 0Its a pretty complicated process, with a ridiculous number of factors involved, and as its mostly estimation about something we're not massively good at anyway (weather prediction), I dont think that any people can claim to know what will happen if we continue as we are with 100% confidence.
However, it must be one of the most easily avoidable potential disaster scenarios that the world will ever face. Even the most sceptical of global warming must realise that theres a possibility it might happen. Therefore why not just simply eradicate that possibility by taking steps that ensure that it wont happen; most the preventative measures aren't even particularly time consuming, expensive or require an inordinate amount of effort. I'm no eco-warrior, but that just seems like common sense to me.
-
02-21-2006, 03:57 AM #3
I understand your thought process here on global warming, but this was not the time to bring it up. This past weekend, the wifey and I went on a little vacation to Chicago (yes, I went to the truefitt and hill store-awesome place). We had a house sitter to watch our home and dogs in our town about 80 miles to the north. Sunday morning at 0400, we got a phone call from our housesitter that she heard a bang and much running water. It turned out to be a water pipe that runs through our garage and to the guest bathroom. The pipe that broke was at least 6 feet from the nearest outside wall but with temps at -15, it didn't matter. Still awaiting the bill for sunday morning callout of a plumber
-Fred
-
02-21-2006, 06:58 AM #4
Wrong FUD
Some are now using the term Global Climate Change.
The warming bit's just the tip of the iceburg(I slay me
). Think hurricane season. Seizmic activity could increase too along with literally dozens of other concerns not the least of which is an increase in harmful ultraviolet. The list goes on.
The balance you are thinking of occurs on a Global scale, Sure that pendulum swings, but it takes centuries(normaly) to move. We're pushing our along too vigorously and moderation is called for. I think they're trying to change the name to avoid backward thinking.
X
-
02-21-2006, 11:32 AM #5
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Sanford, North Carolina
- Posts
- 215
Thanked: 1Let's hear it for warm weather
I'm all for global warming, I think it's too durn cold anyways.
-
02-21-2006, 02:04 PM #6
Originally Posted by Rob
Mason
-
03-06-2006, 03:15 PM #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 8
Thanked: 0congresscritters and plutocrats
Why aren't the movers and shakers from Florida, Hawaii, and other coastal areas putting up more of a show of concern. Where's all the water along the Florida coast going to drain if the sea level goes up 3-4 inches during the next 50 years?