Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
A, so now you're a deity expert as well. What you mean is "if there's a God and he's like humans then he doesn't care at all" because you believe that if there'd be a God he'd do the things that YOU think are right.
You're the one claiming to know what god cares about and you claim I'm the expert?

And now you're telling me what I mean? I know what I mean and it's not what you claim.

There is no evidence of a god intervening in human lives at all. If he's a caring god he sure isn't doing much.

If he just cares about humans but does nothing then he's irrelevant.

Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
No, you're wrong. Most people that believe in God have had plenty of evidence.
They can claim they have evidence but it doesn't mean they actually do.

Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
What you're saying is believe in God without evidence repeatable in a lab. There's quite a difference.
Why would anyone care about anecdotal evidence?

Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
So I'd say that the main difference is then believing someone else's evidence (science) versus your own evidence (religion). That doesn't mean one is more valid than the other. But people who believe in God generally believe that they've had plenty evidence.
No they aren't just as valid. One is anecdotal evidence and the other isn't.
Completely different things.