Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 111 to 116 of 116
  1. #111
    Senior Member decraew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Duffel, Belgium
    Posts
    678
    Thanked: 101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Navaja View Post
    The solution to education is private schools.
    What will you get then ? What you pay for, that is: good schools for rich people's children, then going down to crap schools for the poor. Unless you don't think education is important, privatisation of schools is a really bad idea. Make sure the public money spent on schools is spent well, but don't go to a system where there's shareholders and CEOs to pay, that will make education only more expensive.

    Why do so many among you think privatisation is the solution for everything ?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to decraew For This Useful Post:

    kerryman71 (03-15-2011)

  3. #112
    Senior Member Navaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    340
    Thanked: 53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by decraew View Post

    Why do so many among you think privatisation is the solution for everything ?

    We already have plenty of proof that the government can't even run a candy store successfully. (USPS, Amtrak, etc)

    Privatization brings in competition, leading to better quality and lower costs.

    Why do you think home schooling is becoming more popular every day?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Navaja For This Useful Post:

    DCasper (03-17-2011)

  5. #113
    Senior Member decraew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Duffel, Belgium
    Posts
    678
    Thanked: 101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Navaja View Post
    Privatization brings in competition, leading to better quality and lower costs.
    That's the idea behind privatisation indeed. Except that, as a generalisation, I don't believe it for one second. Oh, a lot of government agencies are run badly. But so are some private companies (Enron, some banks, remember ?).

    I fully agree with the idea of competition, that's the good point about privatisation. Although it doesn't always work because there are too few providers, or priviliged providers (the name Haliburton ring a bell ?). Closer home I'm thinking of energy providers and mobile network providers.

    Better quality ? Sometimes, yes, but I would prefer to make sure the government agencies work well. Health care e.g. works better in my country, at a lower cost, and it's definitely not in private hands. I've heard the complaint that in the UK, after privatisation, the train service actually got worse (one of the UK members care to comment ?)

    Lower costs ? Taking into account executive pay, marketing costs, profits to shareholders ? There's just no way ... unless you ship the work to India and the likes.

    Don't get me wrong, I fully support privatisation in some instances. I just don't see it as the Holy Solution To Every Problem that a lot see in it. There's a lot of problems involved too.

    Also, for me it is unethical to make money out of something like e.g. warfare, healthcare, education. But I know that's not a popular view of things.

    Quote Originally Posted by Navaja View Post
    Why do you think home schooling is becoming more popular every day?
    Because some parents believe the Earth is Flat, and are disgusted by schools that stubbornly refuse to teach Flat Earth Theory ?
    No seriously, I can believe your education system sucks, but I don't believe privatisation is the way to go. Unless you think it's ok that the quality of your education depends on how much you pay for it.
    I know our education system works, and, you know what, it's not privatised at all !

  6. #114
    Inane Rambler Troggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    574
    Thanked: 128

    Default

    Column: Do unions help or hurt public education? | MLive.com

    interesting read from someone who has studied Teacher unions over the past 20+ years.

  7. #115
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,795
    Thanked: 5017
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Privatization eh? When I worked for the Fed Govt my office had all the clerks in one unit privatized. So lets see how that worked. At that time the Govt counterparts were Gs-3 clerks earning 15 grand a year and their benefits. The private outfit paid their people 18 grand a year however they had no benefits at all and because they worked them at 39 hours a week didn't even qualify under state law benefits. So instead of the employees getting a decent deal the owners of the company were raking in the big bucks. Every other month they were taking up collections because one of these people had some financial issue due to sickness usually since they had no medical benefits and couldn't afford to buy a plan.

    It's only when you figure costs over 30-50 years that the Govt came out ahead. Short term it cost them way more money. Unfortunately many of the companies lost contracts and many Govt employees these days quit before ever making it to retirement so many of these money saving models were political garbage.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to thebigspendur For This Useful Post:

    nun2sharp (03-18-2011)

  9. #116
    Connoisseur of steel Hawkeye5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    937
    Thanked: 443

    Default

    Plato said that, "One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be governed by your inferiors."

    And so it has come to pass.
    Last edited by Hawkeye5; 03-21-2011 at 02:57 AM.

Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •