Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Is This A Scam ? (cell phone/bluetooth protection)

  1. #21
    Senior Member Crotalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    811
    Thanked: 84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niftyshaving View Post
    Bluetooth devices are much lower power than phones so bluetooth is "better"
    than a phone along side your ear.
    On the flip side, bluetooth devices are always transmitting, even if there is no phone conversation. So long term the EMF dosage might be higher.

  2. #22
    Senior Member blabbermouth niftyshaving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,157
    Thanked: 852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
    On the flip side, bluetooth devices are always transmitting, even if there is no phone conversation. So long term the EMF dosage might be higher.
    Phones are constantly in contact with the towers. Most importantly they
    will often attempt to connect towers that they will never use only to find that
    the transmitter must be run way up. If you happen to hang out in a marginal
    service area (most of Silicon Valley, CA) the phone is always searching for
    a better tower.

    So you may be correct yet other individuals in others service areas will
    have another view of the issue.

    Of interest the local g'vment has begun embracing mini towers that can
    be bolted to common light and power poles so in a year I may have
    a different view of it all from my phone.

    Of interest BlueTooth device use astoundingly low power levels.
    In some cases the bluetooth levels can be 1/100th of cell phone
    levels. Since power is reduced by the square of the distance
    moving the phone itself to arms length has a big power change
    and since water is a big cell phone problem moving from two inches
    from the old wet brain to three feet away helps the phone so it
    can operate at lower power and also reduce power to the old
    wet noodle by perhaps 256 or more. Moving the phone itself
    from 2" to 6' is a reduction change of 1024 fold.

    Some Bluetooth receiver front ends are sensitive down to fempto watts
    which boggles my mind.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •