Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Vlad the Impaler LX_Emergency's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oss, the Netherlands
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanked: 223

    Default

    Fudge me....I'm not exactly non-versed on computers but I could hardly follow a word of what was said in this topic!

  2. #12
    CRR
    CRR is offline
    Whisker Wacker
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Aptos, CA
    Posts
    208
    Thanked: 15

    Default

    Draft N will is generally much better. The range is just better than 802.11b/g because of improvements in radio tech. and phys. transfer rates. Seems to do a much better job in homes with lots of walls and angles, that cause some problems for reception for b/g routers.

    The obviuos problem with "pre-n" is due to the lack of an adopted standard, companies implement things differently so it seems to be hit or miss with people and different deployment scenarios. Once things get consistent, I think it will make wireless networks in the home a much better experience.

  3. #13
    No Blood, No Glory TomlinAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Right now...Al Asad, Iraq
    Posts
    175
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Just a quick note; depending on where you live even in NA you may see a difference in speeds between 802.11b and g. I have an 8 MBit cable connection at home and it has some thing called "powerboost" by Comcast. I am not sure how PB works, but on my cabled machine I almost had a heart attack the day after they implemented it, and I downloaded IE7 from microsoft at 1280 kbps.

    To be fair, you can almost see Redmond from the space needle... But I routinely hit 800-900 kbps on downloads, and the my connection's latency has dropped, too.

    However, I am using a cabled connection on that computer at 100Mbps. My wife's laptop has a 802.11g in it and gets 54Mbps throughout our apartment, but it is still noticeably slower on large file transfers. Why is this? I really don't know. Looking at the numbers, it shouldn't make a bit of difference, since the connection is capped at 8 Mbps, each computer should easily be able to max out the connection. It just doesn't seem to work that way.

    If anyone has a more technical reason, I'd love to hear it

  4. #14
    Senior Member gglockner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Grandview Washington
    Posts
    332
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
    Fudge me....I'm not exactly non-versed on computers but I could hardly follow a word of what was said in this topic!

    Well funny how things happen around here. Almost like that game where people are in a circle and whisper something to the person next to them... By the time it gets to post number 12 or so it is a new topic.

    Just to clarify things Mr LX, I just wanted to know if my internet connection would improve (faster) if I upgraded to Super G. Range is not a problem.

    Thanks Wok!
    Glen

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •