Whats your opinion on automatic weapons?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gssixgun

I guess I am misreading those statements then :shrug:

---

Thanks for acknowledging that.

--james

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jgkeegan

You asked.

I cannot explain your behavior. Can you?

---

Of course I can. But obviously you will not, and choose instead to redirect the conversation flippantly and in a condescending manner, which I am finding to be a waste of my time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by honedright

Of course I can. But obviously you will not, and choose instead to redirect the conversation flippantly and in a condescending manner, which I am finding to be a waste of my time.

---

Can you explain why you are so seemingly critical of my inability to explain your behavior?

And here we go with another train wreck :dropjaw:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jgkeegan

Can you explain why you are so seemingly critical of my inability to explain your behavior?

---

Classic trolling. Ignore the discussion and make it out like asylum-quality dialogue is being provided by other people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveW

Classic trolling. Ignore the discussion and make it out like asylum-quality dialogue is being provided by other people.

---

I wondered if that's what I was reading too.

I thought it was fair to give the benefit of doubt.

no no... I thought it was you doing the trolling. It wasn't intentional?

It's a classic troll trick to stop a discussion in the middle and claim that nobody understands a poster because of the commenter's inability (or feigned inability) to understand the subject poster.

Really, I thought it was an intentional diversionary tactic.

Along with the heart-string tugging misdirection of the slaughtered masses who have been "mocked".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveW

no no... I thought it was you doing the trolling. It wasn't intentional?

It's a classic troll trick to stop a discussion in the middle and claim that nobody understands a poster because of the commenter's inability (or feigned inability) to understand the subject poster.

Really, I thought it was an intentional diversionary tactic.

Along with the heart-string tugging misdirection of the slaughtered masses who have been "mocked".

---

No problem. Thanks for explaining what you were thinking.


I've read too hurriedly and made similar misreads in the past.

Cheers.

The confusion in this thread almost makes me want to read the whole thing. But then I'll end up arguing with posts back on pages like 13 and 24, and nobody likes that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveW

The confusion in this thread almost makes me want to read the whole thing. But then I'll end up arguing with posts back on pages like 13 and 24, and nobody likes that.

---

Don't bother Dave, you will find the same arguements from the Anti's based on heartfelt hate, and the same cold calculated facts produced by the Pro's They will never ever face the facts, and we will never ever give up our Rights willingly :)

Until the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is abolished/re-written it is a moot point, and a word of warning to the Anti's be very very careful what you wish for, Justice is really Blind and if you get rid of one amendment it mght be you trying to stop us from sliding down that slippery slope next..