Originally Posted by
gugi
Sure, you can pretend to live in an alternate reality, but the facts are just the same. The 'War of Northern Aggression' was fought over the freedom to own property. And yes, it was a Northern Republican who ended slavery, yet the petitions we're talking about are precisely about undoing what Lincoln did (keep the union from splitting apart).
I am sorry, but substance is substance and you can not simply negate it by applying a label that meant something completely different 150 years ago.
If you want to make a valid argument about opportunity, you can simply list the highest ranking public officials from the pre- Civil Rights times. Even better if you get back to before the New Deal which, I hear, ruined everything that was great about this country. If your claims are true, you should have no difficulty whatsoever because back then U.S.A. would've provided a lot more opportunities and a lot less entitlements.
What have you got?