Originally Posted by
Bruno
Up to a point yes.
First of all, this is very expensive because wages are more costly per hour than for a day job. Additionally, you have to have time slotted in for maintenance or your production line will break down. You just cannot run a production line 24/7 for any length of time before the cost increases significantly.
However, ignoring all that consider the following scenario: Manufacturers instate 24 / 7 shifts. and hire a lot of extra crew. They'd need to, because you just need a lot more hot bodies to man the shifts. After a year, the ammo buyers finally come to their senses and recongize that they have been hoarding because others were hoarding (which is the case). Demand will drop significantly, along with prices.
What do they do then?
Fire all the ones they hired in the previous year, along with a part of the original staff that are not needed anymore because demand has dropped so much? This means mass layoffs, bad PR, cost of severance pay, union strikes, etc, plus the loss of qualified personnel. Quarterly earnings drop so the stock price drops as well. And then when demand goes back up after a while, they need to again hire new employees to replace the experienced ones they lost during the layoff round?
Manufacturin planning is a LOT more complex than saying 'quick, let's make more X'. Beyond the point where capacity can be increased by working overtime and moderate increases in workforce, it all depends on long term expectations. If the companies themselves don't see a long term uptake in demand, they know that quickly dumping large amounts of ammo on the temporary demand will hurt them in the end.
Plenty of very smart finance guys will have looked at their situation already and they will have run the numbers to see if there's extra money to be had. They're not stupid. If anything, they're greedy :). If none of them are planning a significant upstep in production capabilities, it's because they know it's not worth it.