Results 11 to 15 of 15
Thread: Pre-1760 With Popsicles
-
09-15-2017, 10:54 PM #11
For sure a beautiful blade... I love it. And I second the pinning, it's a much cleaner look. You would have to recess the screws to be flush to not stand out so much. And careful with the filing of the pining as to not damage the scale. But I gotta ask... why popsicle sticks man? It seems like such a cheap and easy way out for such an original and beautiful piece. No matter the time and effort put in, know that when it is finished, it is finished for ever (or so you hope).
-
09-15-2017, 11:46 PM #12
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Idaho
- Posts
- 25
Thanked: 11Pre-1760 With Popsicles
I don't have the powertools, nice hand tools, a little peening anvil, or even a garage. I don't have the time to carve out solid pieces of ironwood or cherry.
I'm in school, so cannot change any of these circumstances for a few years.
The nice thing about about using screws and cheap materials is that I know I can disassemble it all, and do better later when I have the money and tools. And, not feel bad if the scales break in the process.
I would disagree that the popsicle sticks are any worse than other options. They can be made from quality woods with good grain. Provided I had all the tools, I bet you wouldn't have known...
Regardless, I'm starting to peen.
Maybe I'll come back to this one sooner than later once I have the peening down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
09-16-2017, 12:14 AM #13
Ahhh I understand, and all valid points. Keep up the passion and interest my friend. It will all grow in time. And I agree. Not a bad job for popsicle sticks. But all you truly need is sand paper.lol I've made many from blocks and sandpaper. Trust me tho. Many hours invested.lol but yea you would need a little peening hammer a solid surface, a file, and an according drill bit. Bû none the less, god job and keep up the passion.
-
09-16-2017, 12:56 PM #14
Indeed, at this moment such blade shapes can't be definitely dated as pre-1760,
although IMHO this “Dip-at-toe” seems to look more as an older variant then the
"typical" “Dip-at-toe” from 1760-1790, IF it is made in Sheffield (can't be sure...).
It also seems that Sheffield razors around 1760-1790 didn't have such a long tail & pronounced
notch on top of the tang, so, together with the shape of the tail & the more pronounced notch
on top of the tang, as seen on even older razors, I believe this razor could indeed be older then
1760 (maybe around 1700-1750).
More references & study is needed, maybe we will never be sure...
So, definitely between 1560 & 1800!Last edited by Fikira; 09-16-2017 at 12:59 PM.
-
09-16-2017, 01:30 PM #15
-
The Following User Says Thank You to 32t For This Useful Post:
Fikira (09-16-2017)