Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thread: Is it a myth?
-
01-09-2009, 01:53 PM #11
-
01-09-2009, 07:12 PM #12
-
01-09-2009, 07:18 PM #13
I don't know about thicker but it sure is grayer.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
01-09-2009, 07:39 PM #14
Hi X, I would tend to think that you guys are right but let me tell you about my observation first. I purposely omitted a few details from my previous post. Some friends of mine decided to stop shaving their armpits and legs. They all had thicker (this was after months of not shaving) hair that my friends that NEVER shaved theirs. The sample was somewhat small ( but larger than 10) and I did not measure the thickness of the hair before, during;-) or after so I do not feel that I can draw any conclusions. Perhaps all of my friends that never shaved, had thinner hair to begin with but it stuck in my head that it was not the other way around. As I said, my observation does not provide scientific evidence one way or another. I would like to find out more about it though.
Al raz.
-
01-09-2009, 08:11 PM #15
I believe it's a myth. One reason I've read that hair appears thicker after it grows back is because the base of the hair is coarser than if it's longer. So when you shave and it grows back, it only looks thicker at first, but only because the actual hair shaft is thicker closer to the base.
I could be completely wrong, but I seem to remember reading that somewhere....But firsthand I have not seen any correlation between shaving frequency and growth/thickness of hair.
Dave
-
01-10-2009, 11:50 PM #16
-
01-11-2009, 12:06 AM #17
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 150
Thanked: 17MYTH!!!!
if it were true, i'd be grizzly adams right now. i spent 12 years in the army shaving everyday, got out, and it takes me like 3 weeks to grow a decent beard.
-
01-12-2009, 07:26 PM #18