Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    158
    Thanked: 1

    Default anybody know the ratio to figure spine thickness compared to blade width?

    title says it all...

  2. #2
    < Banned User > Blade Wielder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,392
    Thanked: 91

    Default

    Ratios? How to figure out spine thickness? Personally, I just grab my tape measure.

    Besides, if the blade has been honed a lot, the original size of the razor will have been reduced.

  3. #3
    Senior Member vladsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    683
    Thanked: 7

    Default

    I think the answer you are looking for is 3.5

    blade width = 3.5 x spine thickness.

    There is a thread a month or so ago that covered the topic more extensively, if you are interested..

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    158
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    I though it was 3.5 but couldn't remember which direction or if that was the correct number thanks guys.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Joe Lerch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,331
    Thanked: 8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gawker
    title says it all...
    I don't believe there'a fixed ratio between blade width and spine thickness. It varies with razor design. For example you can have a 5/8 with a thin spine or a thick spine.

  6. #6
    Super Shaver xman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lotus Land, eh
    Posts
    8,194
    Thanked: 622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blade Wielder
    Besides, if the blade has been honed a lot, the original size of the razor will have been reduced.
    And the spine will wear down as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Lerch
    I don't believe there'a fixed ratio between blade width and spine thickness. It varies with razor design. For example you can have a 5/8 with a thin spine or a thick spine.
    Maybe we should talk about the deapth or heaviness of the spine when we're talking about the kind of thickness you're referring to, Joe.

    X

  7. #7
    Senior Member superfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,950
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Lerch
    I don't believe there'a fixed ratio between blade width and spine thickness. It varies with razor design. For example you can have a 5/8 with a thin spine or a thick spine.
    There is, and it is the 3.5. It is fixed number, and it is used to retain the sharpening angle at the edge of the razor.

    Nenad

  8. #8
    Senior Member Tony Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Nottingham, Maryland
    Posts
    2,559
    Thanked: 382

    Default

    I have to go with Joe on this one. There are razors with heavier spines and lighter spines in every size, the ratio would be different between them. The older Fromm razors had a fairly thick spine and were 5/8, the newer fancy Fromm's are thinner at the spine but still a 5/8 razor, the ratio has to be different as the 5/8 is constant.

    As a generality 3.5 may be an average but not a hard and fast rule.

    Tony
    The Heirloom Razor Strop Company / The Well Shaved Gentleman

    https://heirloomrazorstrop.com/

  9. #9
    Senior Member superfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,950
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    This is a section from the German book “Das Rasiermesser” (The razor) has been written in 1939 and was published by Der Messerschmied Verlag. It goes into detail about production techniques, geometry, and it also addresses the increasing competition with safety razors and electric shavers.

    "One of those rules is the to conserve the thickness of the back, which should be the blade width divided by 3,5. The hollow grinder divides the blade in two halfes: the upper part is hollow, the lower part is a biconvex belly. The biconvex part consists of the edge, the thinning and the belly. The biconcave part of sole, the hollowing, the back and the stabilizing piece. The sole is the thin transition between the belly and the hollow part."

    I guess there are some small tolerances within this rule...

    Nenad

  10. #10
    Senior Member Tony Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Nottingham, Maryland
    Posts
    2,559
    Thanked: 382

    Default

    << should >>

    And there you have it <g>

    Tony
    The Heirloom Razor Strop Company / The Well Shaved Gentleman

    https://heirloomrazorstrop.com/

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •