Results 1 to 10 of 14

Threaded View

cyrano138 I'm trying to establish how... 08-20-2006, 11:56 PM
JLStorm I'll try and help out here,... 08-21-2006, 04:27 AM
cyrano138 mint and functionality... 08-21-2006, 05:57 AM
JLStorm for most purposes if I had... 08-21-2006, 06:56 AM
cyrano138 good points. i guess in a... 08-21-2006, 07:06 AM
Lynn I find that Mint razors are... 08-21-2006, 12:09 PM
HoekmanX According to the dictionary... 08-21-2006, 01:10 PM
JLStorm What about English made? 08-21-2006, 06:05 PM
canerunner Lynn, I think this goes... 08-22-2006, 01:06 AM
thebigspendur I think that if we were all... 08-22-2006, 01:47 AM
JLStorm Did you cry along side with... 08-22-2006, 05:12 AM
cyrano138 i would say, for the sake of... 08-22-2006, 06:20 AM
  1. 08-22-2006, 06:20 AM #12
    cyrano138 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Venice, FL
    Posts
    236
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    i would say, for the sake of defining it to discuss, that as mint-ness increases, the closeness of the razor to its original factory condition increases, with a completely mint razor being exactly as it was when it left the maker's hands. so, no, the guy who dropped his razor no longer owns a mint razor. he owns an unused razor, but use is not the only way to diminish mint-ness. anyway, my original question refers to mint as i've defined it here, if that helps. in reference to what the big spendur said, i would think everyone here would agree that use, no matter how professional or careful the honing and shaving, diminishes mint-ness simply because any kind of use removes metal from the razor, diminishing the number of times it may be used again.

    thanks for all the info and good discussion, everyone.
    Last edited by cyrano138; 08-22-2006 at 06:23 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules