Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thread: Haven't a clue?
-
03-24-2014, 09:30 PM #11
I have lapped it with a 1200 grit diamond hone...slow. I then fined the surface with a Laport white Arkansas hone, this was also slow going. I then tried bringing a slurry up with a small 600 grit DMT, this produced the same slurry as the 1200 of a creamy white colour. It seems as hard a stone as my Coticule and responds in every way the same even the edges produced and the speed it achieves it. I did not think it a Coticule because of the thickness but I suppose it doesn't matter what it is as long as I am happy how it performs.
-
03-24-2014, 10:29 PM #12
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Location
- Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Posts
- 235
Thanked: 24could you show a picture of the lapped stone? just corious to see how it turned out
-
03-24-2014, 10:54 PM #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Upstate New York
- Posts
- 5,782
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 4249I like the Coticule idea, but also perhaps a J-Nat?
-
03-24-2014, 10:57 PM #14
I'll need to borrow a better camera to get a clear shot of the stone. Hope to post tomorrow.
Cheers for all the help guys
-
03-25-2014, 06:07 PM #15
Not so sure this photo is any better but you can just make out the pattern on the stone.
-
03-27-2014, 01:47 PM #16
From this picture I would expect it to be a coticule like the others suggested before.
-
03-27-2014, 01:50 PM #17
All boxed up now for the duel function of razor hone and edge tool finisher.
-
03-27-2014, 01:58 PM #18
Gorgeous work on the stand, Puf. The colors throw me. I'm prob. not the best opinion on identifying stones anyway. First photos looked like yellow/green thuri, middle ones had a more gray cast like some jnats. Last photos look much more yellow/gold. Together w/ your description of how hard it is, I'd suspect a jnat. There are guys here much more qualified opinions on it. I'd want to hear more from them.