Results 11 to 20 of 60
Thread: Whipped Dog "Quarter Nortons"
Hybrid View
-
05-23-2014, 01:16 PM #1
Not "too good to be true ..." it is what it is.
A smaller surface means many more strokes. More strokes, for a beginner at least, means more chances to make a "bad" stroke, and put you back to square one. IMHO. save your funds until you can afford a full size stone.
-
05-23-2014, 01:29 PM #2
I agree with those who say to save up for full size hones. The small ones make for a lot more strokes which mean a lot more chances of a missed stroke.
-
05-23-2014, 08:14 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 802
Thanked: 154Most straight razor blades are about 3" in length; a 2" x 4" inch hone is more than big enough for easy use on blades that size. The full-sized Norton stone is actually excessively big for small knives like straight razors - but boy are they luxurious to use! :-)
de gustibus non est disputandum
-
05-23-2014, 08:21 PM #4
As a rule barber hones are 4'x2" minimum. The old barbers I knew back in the '80s mostly had coticules for finishing and they seemed to be coming from the barber supply @ 5x2-1/2". Eschers, which are noted to be for straight razors on the label, are usually 7x1-5/8, 8x2, or the Barber's Delight, Barber's Gem were 6x2. They did make a 10x3 but that was not common AFAIK. Point being that 4x2 seems to be the minimum that manufacturers made for sale. IME a 5" hone is the minimum I'm personally comfortable with and 6 or 7 is better yet. YMMV.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
05-23-2014, 08:11 PM #5
Just gonna throw this out there. But you can get a full size king 1k/6k for about 45 from amazon. You can shave off that. And for about 30 you can get a Chinese 12k from woodcraft.
Not the popular choice but it will work. Its what I use and I get good results.
-
05-24-2014, 03:31 AM #6
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Lafayette, LA
- Posts
- 1,542
Thanked: 270Honing was difficult for me to learn and I still get frustrated sometimes, and that's with full-sized hones.
I learned most of what I know from videos, and I would be lost if the person doing the instructing said to give a razor 15 laps. I'm not sure that 15 x 4 = 60 laps on a quarter hone would do the same job.
For that reason I wouldn't buy a quarter hone. At least for me, that would be a bad idea.
Straight razor shaver and loving it!40-year survivor of electric and multiblade razors
-
05-24-2014, 03:52 AM #7
I learned a lot by honing on 4"x1" DMT's but the most important thing I learned was that hones that size are a waste of time & money as I eventually bought regular size stones & the DMT's sit unused now.
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
05-25-2014, 01:53 AM #8
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- St. Louis, Missouri, United States
- Posts
- 8,454
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 4942I don't see the need to bait either the Larry or honing trolls here.
Have fun.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
Utopian (05-25-2014)
-
05-27-2014, 01:36 AM #9
1/2 of a Norton would be survivable possibly but aren't they 8 inch stones? Meaning you'll be honing on a 2" stone...even at 10" you'd only have a 2.5" stone....5"+ are all I ever work with otherwise its way slow...a quartered Norton would be a slurry stone in my opinion.