Results 1 to 10 of 55
Like Tree50Likes

Thread: What is the Sp Gr of Your Best Arkansas Stone

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sharptonn View Post
    Certainly, Mr. Miller!

    Name:  moral.jpg
Views: 291
Size:  19.6 KB
    But which one did the gravity test… and on what?

  2. #2
    Razor Vulture sharptonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    25,888
    Thanked: 8590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Euclid440 View Post
    But which one did the gravity test… and on what?
    Well....it is a proven fact that gravity sucks!
    Martin103 likes this.
    "Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
    I rest my case.

  3. #3
    The Hurdy Gurdy Man thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    32,792
    Thanked: 5017
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    If you were doing a scientific treatise on specific gravity and were trying to correlate it to hardness you would be in big trouble. Diamond has a S.G of around 3.4 or so and the main ore of lead (Galena) has one of around 7.5 or so. The lead has a hardness of about 1.5 and Diamond, well you know.

    The basic properties that give a high S.G are usually quite different from those that make it hard.
    Neil Miller and sharptonn like this.
    No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero

  4. #4
    Razor Vulture sharptonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    25,888
    Thanked: 8590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur View Post
    If you were doing a scientific treatise on specific gravity and were trying to correlate it to hardness you would be in big trouble. Diamond has a S.G of around 3.4 or so and the main ore of lead (Galena) has one of around 7.5 or so. The lead has a hardness of about 1.5 and Diamond, well you know.

    The basic properties that give a high S.G are usually quite different from those that make it hard.
    Dang! Just when I thought I understood!
    Neil Miller likes this.
    "Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
    I rest my case.

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanked: 3164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur View Post
    If you were doing a scientific treatise on specific gravity and were trying to correlate it to hardness you would be in big trouble. Diamond has a S.G of around 3.4 or so and the main ore of lead (Galena) has one of around 7.5 or so. The lead has a hardness of about 1.5 and Diamond, well you know.

    The basic properties that give a high S.G are usually quite different from those that make it hard.
    But it is not designed for that purpose, so you would be a bit foolish to use it in that way.

    Dave's post on the previous page sums it quite succinctly, it is to highlight differences within the same group when used by people like Dan, to determine differences etween a group of novaculites.

    Bearing in mind that each mineral has a specific mass that does not correlate with any other mineral should make us wary of using it to debate the virtues of apples as opposed to oranges, let alone write a treatise based on the folly of doing so.

    Regards,
    Neil
    sharptonn, DaveW and Steel like this.

  6. #6
    Razor Vulture sharptonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    25,888
    Thanked: 8590

    Default

    .....orapples????
    Steel likes this.
    "Don't be stubborn. You are missing out."
    I rest my case.

  7. #7
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanked: 3164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sharptonn View Post
    .....orapples????
    ...pineberries...

  8. #8
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,110
    Thanked: 458

    Default

    What neal said. When you're comparing novaculite to novaculite, it's a pretty good indicator (not of hardness, but fineness due to lack of open space in the stone matrix). When you're comparing diamonds to novaculite, it's ...well, I don't know what it is.
    Neil Miller and Steel like this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •