Results 11 to 13 of 13
-
02-21-2016, 06:18 PM #11
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 311
Thanked: 67I don't think the slurry I was seeing was grease/water emulsion. It looked and felt like real slurry. I now think these are relatively soft Arkies. Probably not razor-worthy, but I will use them on my knives.
I'll do some more honing on them and see what the scratch patterns tell me.
-
02-23-2016, 05:31 AM #12
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Location
- Central Oregon
- Posts
- 789
Thanked: 98Hindostan stones, nice coticules.
-
02-23-2016, 11:35 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 311
Thanked: 67My initial tests (on knives) with the two larger oilstones indicates that these are nice, reasonably fast hones around the 2-4K level. They're very consistent, and I see no evidence of inclusions. I'm glad, as I do have a lot of finishers, but not too many medium- to low-grit natural hones.
I tested one of them on my my W&B FBU and it seemed to do a good job on the razor too. I'm still not sure exactly where these hones would fit on a progression. More tests need to be done with and without slurry. I'm not sure that they are fast enough without slurry to be used to bridge a 1K to 8K jump.