Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree16Likes
  • 9 Post By Euclid440
  • 3 Post By markbignosekelly
  • 2 Post By Utopian
  • 2 Post By Vasilis

Thread: Waterstones Test/Comparison. Which is fastest-best?

  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default Waterstones Test/Comparison. Which is fastest-best?

    Waterstones Test/Comparison. Which is fastest-best?

    I came across these two charts buried on the Tools from Japan website/blog, that I found interesting and what I have always suspected about, quality Waterstone performance.

    Back in 2011, Stu Tierney tested a variety of the popular water stones on a variety of tool steels, to see which was the fastest cutting.

    Now, I know he was not testing razors, but the results are interesting, and pretty much what I have suspected for years… it really does not matter all that, much which brand you use, they (Quality Waterstones) all perform pretty much the same.

    What is interesting but not surprising is the consistency in performance of the stones, across the board. Nice to see it in print.

    Yes, you could nit-pick the procedure, and some of the newer stone are not included, but I believe results would still be the same.

    So which is the best…The ones you know how to use…

    Here’s the link to the whole test. Tools from Japan, Waterstones Test. Thanks Stu.

    Name:  012411_1700_Waterstonet12.jpg
Views: 313
Size:  36.0 KBName:  012411_1700_Waterstonet22.jpg
Views: 334
Size:  37.3 KB

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:

    aaron1234 (08-16-2016), bluesman7 (08-16-2016), brightred (08-16-2016), Hirlau (08-16-2016), JimmyHAD (08-16-2016), markbignosekelly (08-16-2016), strangedata (08-18-2016), Substance (08-16-2016), xiaotuzi (08-20-2016)

  3. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth markbignosekelly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Egham, a little town just outside London.
    Posts
    3,733
    Thanked: 1074
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Euclid440 View Post
    So which is the best…The ones you know how to use…
    Need say no more...
    Last edited by markbignosekelly; 08-16-2016 at 07:16 PM.

  4. #3
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm having a hard time with the hone wear calculations. When they are down to the pico-meter scale, which is a million fold smaller than the micron scale for single pieces of grit, then it seems to lose a little credibility. I appreciate the effort made, but I cannot accept that level of significance for hone wear in Waterstone testing part IV.
    Substance and strangedata like this.

  5. #4
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    The significance on razors is small, but from all the stones around 1k I've bought and used them on swords, my results were similar. For example, comparing the king 1k with the sigma select II 1.2k, the second is at least 10 times faster. It could even be 20x as fast. Or the difference between the Bester-fast and Naniwa superstone-slow, which is similar to the king. And Norton 1k. I would like to get an Arashiyama some time soon but I have no clue on where to find them. Without ridiculously expensive shipping.

    Also, we need a thread with the exact same title that compares natural finishing stones, with/without slurry, that's what I thought this thread was about when I read the title.
    benhunt and strangedata like this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •