Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Yet another please identify my hone-thread

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    8
    Thanked: 1

    Default Yet another please identify my hone-thread

    A friend gave me a razor hone some time ago (black stone, second from the bottom), and I'd like to know what kind of stone it is. I added a number of other fairly well known stones for colour reference, and I did weigh and measure all the loose stones to calculate their density.

    From top to bottom:

    Washita, density ~2,00 (fairly large margin for error, too small to get the accurate weight)
    Smiths Soft Arkansas
    Norton Hard Arkansas (Translucent, I'd say), density 2,65
    Mystery hone, density 2,80
    Escher, thurungian if I'm not mistaken.

    The mystery hone is dark grey or black, a bit heavier than the translucent arkansas as the density shows, it used to have remains of a label with the word "razor" or something like that but it was removed by the previous owner. Water does not "wet it", it mostly just gets pushed off the stone by the razor when you draw it across. Worked well with oil (WD40).

    I am not skilled at sharpening razors (yet), nor do I have a descent strop or stropping compound. (I'm getting there, sooner or later.) I did however make an attempt to hone a few old razors on the hard arkansas, the escher and the mystery hone, the arkansas and escher did make the razors sharp enough for cutting arm hair, the mystery hone gave a clearly better result - not nearly good enough to shave with it, but I'm guessing that's where a strop would make a big diffrence.

    Anyone have an idea what kind of hone it might be?

    Name:  DSC04133.jpg
Views: 342
Size:  43.2 KB

    Name:  DSC04134.jpg
Views: 369
Size:  43.8 KB

    Name:  DSC04135.jpg
Views: 364
Size:  42.5 KB
    MODINE and RusenBG like this.

  2. #2
    The First Cut is the Deepest! Magpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Middle Slobovia NY
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanked: 480

    Default

    Thats a mighty high density there. By looks, I would say a surgical black Ark, but I have never encountered one of that density.

    Perhaps it was one of those "For Good Razors" hones? Anybody ever do a density check on theirs?

  3. #3
    Historically Inquisitive Martin103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    5,780
    Thanked: 4249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    From the description and looks I would think it is highly possible that it is in fact a Black Arkansas.
    Density Standards
    Soft Arkansas**** **********2.20-2.30*** Specific Gravity
    Hard Arkansas*********** * 2.30-2.45****Specific Gravity
    True Hard Arkansas***** *2.50 +** * ****Specific Gravity
    Colored Translucent**** * 2.50 +**** ****Specific Gravity
    Black Arkansas************ 2.50 +**** *** Specific Gravity
    Marshal likes this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth RezDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    14,389
    Thanked: 4821

    Default

    How does density get calculaed
    aaron1234 likes this.
    It's not what you know, it's who you take fishing!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to RezDog For This Useful Post:

    aaron1234 (11-25-2016)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Density is mass/volume. Specific gravity is density of the item under test/density of water. Density of water is near enough 1g/cm³ so for our purposes density and specific gravity are near enough to be called the same.

    The highest density possible for an Ark is something like 2.65 or thereabouts - this is the density of pure void-free quartz/SiO2 - what Arks are made of almost 100%. I would like to hear what method was used to arrive at the figures given for the OP's stones. Measuring with a ruler and cheap postal scale will not give accurate numbers.
    Last edited by eKretz; 11-25-2016 at 04:58 AM.

  7. #6
    Senior Member doorsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanked: 539

    Default Yet another please identify my hone-thread

    Quote Originally Posted by eKretz View Post
    Density is mass/volume. Specific gravity is density of the item under test/density of water. Density of water is near enough 1g/cm³ so for our purposes density and specific gravity are near enough to be called the same.

    The highest density possible for an Ark is something like 2.65 or thereabouts - this is the density of pure void-free quartz/SiO2 - what Arks are made of almost 100%. I would like to hear what method was used to arrive at the figures given for the OP's stones. Measuring with a ruler and cheap postal scale will not give accurate numbers.
    Just calculated yesterday, my Trans Ark was around 2.80 so are you sure Eric? Iam sure i calculated correct....

    I also dont think you need a hypercalculated ruler, if youre correct on mm that should do it.

    I would vote for surgical Black Ark, not too many other possibilities around...
    Steel and Marshal like this.
    ███▓▒░░.RAZORLOVESTONES.░░▒▓███

  8. #7
    Senior Member doorsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanked: 539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magpie View Post
    Perhaps it was one of those "For Good Razors" hones? Anybody ever do a density check on theirs?
    Can do that later if wished, but its a dense slate, iam quite sure its below....
    ███▓▒░░.RAZORLOVESTONES.░░▒▓███

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Yes I'm sure. The only way it could possibly be higher would be if you had a stone with impurities - which is very rare for an Ark. They are usually on the order of 99.5% pure silica. To properly measure density, volume and weight should be measured very closely - digital calipers do nicely - but you need to measure in four places for each dimension and average if the sides aren't parallel. Don't forget that any error in measuring is cubed! This still won't give an accurate measure of volume if the stone is chamfered or if it's porous enough to absorb water. The best way to accurately measure the volume is with a liquid - i.e. water and a burette, but not many have this equipment. Weight to the gram is probably close enough.

    I have measured probably 30 hard Arks and never found one over 2.65 S.G.
    Last edited by eKretz; 11-25-2016 at 05:39 AM.
    rolodave likes this.

  10. #9
    Senior Member doorsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanked: 539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doorsch View Post
    Can do that later if wished, but its a dense slate, iam quite sure its below....
    Did calculate a Purple La Lune, to prove what unaccury does i took the Values and changed them with reducing around 2mm on one side measurement.....

    Normal Calculation
    10.1 x 5.1 x 2.1 / 311 gramm = 2.87gr/cm2

    Changing values
    10.1 x 5.1 x 1.9 / 311 gramm = 3.17 gr/cm2
    10.1 x 5.1 x 1.7 / 311 gramm = 3.55 gr/cm2

    So the purple Lune fex shows a very high density. Somebody can make a counter measurement on a purple lune?
    ███▓▒░░.RAZORLOVESTONES.░░▒▓███

  11. #10
    Senior Member Brontosaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Les Vosges, France
    Posts
    924
    Thanked: 185

    Default

    One post in. Welcome to SRP. Please introduce yourself further. Density is not the same thing as specific gravity, no? In any case, I'll take the hard Arkansas stone as shown.
    Last edited by Brontosaurus; 11-25-2016 at 05:54 AM.
    Striving to be brief, I become obscure. --Horace

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •