Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
Like Tree19Likes

Thread: How is grit determined?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Portland, Maine
    Posts
    25
    Thanked: 2

    Default How is grit determined?

    This is actually my first post on SRP - so happy I'm finally getting involved. I'm much more active and knowledgeable in the knife community at kitchenknifeforums.com, and have a respectable collection of Jnats, with a dozen or so other hones from around the world, as well as a dozen or so synthetics. Anyways, oddly enough, I've found it nearly impossible to find an answer to how grit is determined in synthetics (this question can't really be applied to naturals as we use synthetics to reference estimated grit in naturals, and the abrasive density is much less uniform in naturals than synthetics, obviously).
    Does anyone know, especially in JIS and AISI? I think I once read long ago that it's the average density of abrasive particles in 2.5cm^2, but that seems like an odd and arbitrary number. Any insight would be appreciated.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Jack of all, master of none KenWeir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Elysian Fields, TX
    Posts
    578
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    It has to do with sedimentation rate, or at least that's how the finer grit particles are separated. Here's a table with the particle diameters of common synthetics, along with some natural stones, which I'd take with a grain of salt.

    grit particle size
    Geezer likes this.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Portland, Maine
    Posts
    25
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KenWeir View Post
    It has to do with sedimentation rate, or at least that's how the finer grit particles are separated. Here's a table with the particle diameters of common synthetics, along with some natural stones, which I'd take with a grain of salt.

    grit particle size
    Thanks. I'm also aware of this chart, which is a bit more comprehensive.

    I guess a better way to state this is 'how is grit measured'? It certainly is a function of particle size, but what about the area? Is it squared, ie sandpaper, or cubed, ie stones? Or something else entirely?
    Last edited by Shokunin; 12-16-2016 at 08:00 PM.

  4. #4
    Jack of all, master of none KenWeir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Elysian Fields, TX
    Posts
    578
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    No, it might as well be thought of as arbitrary.
    1k grit shapton isn't the same as a 1k norton

    1k grit sandpaper in the us isn't the same as 1k sandpaper in uk

    Edit: there's no hard and fast rule, this grit has this size particles, because every manufacturer is different.

    Edit2: other considerations might be how well the particles are bonded, that will control how much slurry you generate, and how jagged or smooth the particles are. One manufacturer may use smaller particles than another, but if those particles have more sharp corners/edges it may still cut faster than the stone with larger but smoother particles. Other manufacturers might be using different materials all together, which may cut differently

    Edit3: each manufacturer may have its own formulae for max, min and avg particle size for each grit, but there isn't really anything industry-wide because every manufacturer is different.
    Last edited by KenWeir; 12-16-2016 at 08:35 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    Welcome to SRP, just to add to the confusion .......... from '09, by smokin'tbird ;

    http://straightrazorpalace.com/advan...tml#post446896
    rolodave and KenWeir like this.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:

    Marshal (12-16-2016), tinkersd (12-17-2016)

  7. #6
    Jack of all, master of none KenWeir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Elysian Fields, TX
    Posts
    578
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    I love it!

    As far as how a manufacturer determines what grit to call a product, its approximation. They'll either make their own abrasive particles or buy in bulk, adjust binder strength, binder to grit ratio and overall density to get the final product some where close enough to what people expect out of a certain grit, let's say 4K, that they can get away with calling it 4K, instead of 3379 or 4400.
    Last edited by KenWeir; 12-16-2016 at 08:40 PM.
    StewieS likes this.

  8. #7
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KenWeir View Post
    No, it might as well be thought of as arbitrary.
    1k grit shapton isn't the same as a 1k norton

    1k grit sandpaper in the us isn't the same as 1k sandpaper in uk

    Edit: there's no hard and fast rule, this grit has this size particles, because every manufacturer is different.

    Edit2: other considerations might be how well the particles are bonded, that will control how much slurry you generate, and how jagged or smooth the particles are. One manufacturer may use smaller particles than another, but if those particles have more sharp corners/edges it may still cut faster than the stone with larger but smoother particles. Other manufacturers might be using different materials all together, which may cut differently
    Very much this.

    Binder will have a large effect on a hone's performance. Barber hones are the perfect example of this.

    Barber hone cutting material is actually in the range of 300-600 grit, yet a good barber hone will leave an edge equivalent to or better than an 8K hone. This is because those large particles are both very tightly bound - they do not break free or slurry - and they are very well worn. Almost dead flat with the surface of the hone and just barely poking up enough to remove a very small amount of metal. Those same particles in a loose binder that allows for slurry would wreak havoc on an edge.

    It's quite an intriguing dynamic.

    I'm at the point now where I am less concerned with any stone's 'grit rating' and more concerned with it's performance relative to a known quantity. For me, that's the Norton 1/4/8K because I own them and I'm quite familiar with those hones. YMMV.
    KenWeir likes this.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Marshal For This Useful Post:

    tinkersd (12-17-2016)

  10. #8
    Jack of all, master of none KenWeir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Elysian Fields, TX
    Posts
    578
    Thanked: 79

    Default

    Far t many variables to consider for there to be any simple formula.

  11. #9
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    26,948
    Thanked: 13221
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default



    Here is the Glen system use it if you want

    Grit

    A Norton 1k is more abrasive then a Norton 4k which is more abrasive then a Norton 8k

    A Naniwa SS 3k is more abrasive then a Naniwa SS 5k or 8k or 12K

    A Naniwa Pro 1k is more abrasive then a Pro 3k or 5k or 10k

    A Shapton GS 4k is more abrasive then an Shapton GS 8k

    A Shapton Pro 8k is more abrasive then a Shapton Pro 15k

    These are things I know

    As soon as you move away from a Brand of hone or even a series within a brand of hone then you do not know any longer you are simply Hypothesizing

    Any grit rating on a Natural hone is a WAG, (or marketing) and that is the Glen theory of Hones and Stones it has served me well for honing a couple of SR's
    Last edited by gssixgun; 12-16-2016 at 09:52 PM.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    cudarunner (12-17-2016), KenWeir (12-16-2016), Razorfeld (12-16-2016), tinkersd (12-17-2016)

  13. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Portland, Maine
    Posts
    25
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    These are all great answers - thank you. Yes, less of a concern, and more of just wanting to see if anyone knew. An intriguing subject, especially since it varies from brand to brand. Sometimes I wish there was more oversight, but the variation is also part of the magic. Thanks!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •