Results 1 to 10 of 36
Thread: Jnat "grit" question
-
02-27-2017, 04:45 AM #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Upper Middle Slobovia NY
- Posts
- 2,736
Thanked: 480Jnat "grit" question
So, as is my mentally unbalanced nature, I am getting the urge to spend more money that I dont actually have.
I have a very sparse set of Jnats. an Asagi, a hard white nagura (not sure what kind) that came with it, a Tsuchima nagura. I get great shaves with it, but just not all that much better than from my Nani12k. It gets a bit "skippy" which is more of an annoyance than anything, but you know how that can get on your nerves if your having a bad day.
So I am curious as to what hone would be the best Final Finish Only stone. As in, which of the various colors/strata would be most likely to have the finest grit?
I dont mind a painfully slow stone if it is going to bring me a feeling of "it dont get better than this"
Do any of the softer stones slurry down to the status of "super fine" or do Jnats fall more into the "The Harder the Finer" category and need to be all shining like an Arkansas stone?
I'm just not digging on the "rub this course stone on this finer stone" thing. I would just as soon have 4 or 5 blocks of stupid expensive single purpose stones.
You know, because. I have no common sense or self control.
-
02-27-2017, 04:48 AM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Saratoga, CA
- Posts
- 597
Thanked: 59You must be my brother from another mother....
Lets go shopping...
What is your ceiling?Last edited by Aerdvaark; 02-27-2017 at 04:52 AM.
-
02-27-2017, 06:15 AM #3
-
02-27-2017, 06:23 AM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Saratoga, CA
- Posts
- 597
Thanked: 59Perfect! Sheetrock and mud here!!
-
02-27-2017, 07:30 AM #5
Depends on your price limit.
The most affordable yet dense layer is Namito. Asagi & Kiita colours will be neighbours there.
Travelling higher up towards Aisa & Tomae, ie less dense should be cheaper & deeper down towards Hon Suita will be more expensive.
Of course all those layers can have anomalous densities from stone to stone which is why we always recommend you pick a seller you have faith in & ask them to help you pick.
Razor stones are generally in the hard category to keep the bevels flat. It's not so much about the fineness.
You wouldn't need 4 or 5 expensive stones. A pre polisher & Polisher would be enough.
You could possibly jump from a Tsushima to the pre polisher etc.
Only thing is setting bevels on a natural is much slower than synthetics.Last edited by onimaru55; 02-27-2017 at 07:33 AM.
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:
markbignosekelly (02-27-2017), tinkersd (02-27-2017)
-
02-27-2017, 07:39 AM #6
-
02-27-2017, 10:27 AM #7
Yes & no. Soft stones release grit more readily & are rarely as fine as a good hard razor stone, tho some expensive ones come so close there can be overlap. The tendency is to slightly less sharp due to dare I say it "slurry dulling". The edge gets slightly convexed. It's not like you need to lap the stone like a 1k King setting a bevel on a wedge
A final edge can be a very personal thing.The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to onimaru55 For This Useful Post:
Magpie (02-27-2017)
-
02-27-2017, 05:00 PM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Upper Middle Slobovia NY
- Posts
- 2,736
Thanked: 480Oh by all means, Dare Say It! This is a very real thing that most people dont get. It drove me insane why my edges were not any good when I first started trying to hone with a Coti. a little slurry goes a very long way!
But when I say "soft stone" when using the number system that people seem to like with the Jnats, I was thinking 4-4.5 instead of the 5 or 5+
I also dont get that number system. why not just go 1-10 instead of adding "plus" or half marks.
-
02-27-2017, 05:52 PM #9
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 2,224
Thanked: 481Because then we'd be looking at 1-10(+), and instead of looking at a stone that's 4 or 4.5, you'd be looking at a range including 8, 8.5, and 9. The half marks and pluses wouldn't go anywhere.
-
02-27-2017, 06:03 PM #10
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795Also, if the scale went to 10, then I regularly would be saying that mine go to eleven!
--big fan of This Is Spinal Tap