Results 21 to 30 of 42
-
08-05-2017, 04:02 PM #21
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459Those are dark gray trans stones with a structure more like a trans stone (no large foreign particles like you can get with some black stones from some vendors), and they have some translucence, which you definitely don't get with a jet black stone like the dan's stone I showed.
Those stones are actually pretty inexpensive for what they are (being a large trans). Norton sold a lot of stones that were dark gray trans, too. Their current black stones aren't like that, at least not all of them, but a lot of the vintage ones are.
Great stones. Only complaint one could have about them if trying to substitute them with a white trans stone is that sometimes easily seeing the black swarf is useful, especially if you're trying to figure out if something needs to be heat treated (steel that's not as hard as it should be will easily hone away even on a trans stone, but stone around 60-62 hardness will almost cease to be cut by a stone that is settled in).
-
08-05-2017, 04:19 PM #22
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459No, I didn't see that. Thanks! I was down for the count for several months early this year due to a medication reaction, and still have cobwebs and confusion from it. It sucks! And I missed that!
In terms of the usability, I wonder if they have better stock for trans stones than pike did. I can't find the excerpt that I originally saw, but I remember finding it on google image. It was a picture about 125 years old or older of some guy pushing a cart or standing by one at the pike mine, and a boast about how good and uniform the stock was, and that there was no other in the world (which everyone said back then, but I think it was actually true for washitas in their case). At any rate, they talked of 2500 pound or greater uniform chunks that could just be cut into flawless stones.
Joel Moskowitz at TFWW relayed to me that Norton wastes huge amounts of stone when making a 2x8 (I asked him why the 8x3 is so cheap when the 2x8 is so expensive - because I wanted the 2x8 and I just don't feel like Norton's stock these days is worth the risk at $175-$200. It's decent, but not that decent).
But Dan's is clearly saying otherwise in terms of waste (or perhaps the stuff that they sell off in 50 pound lots is what Norton calls waste).
https://www.danswhetstone.com/flint-...raw-materials/
(if you really want to play billy big rigger, they will sell you raw stone in minimum lots of 500 pounds).
The german/swiss in me (well, that's 100% of it) really likes to see that they have a market for the spalls instead of just throwing them out, though I guess it's not the worst thing in the world if you take literal rock and put it back outside.
-
08-05-2017, 06:48 PM #23
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459
Density, density, density, that's about all there is. Color doesn't matter as long as the stones are pure. I guess you could say pore characteristics, too, but that just goes back to density. I sometimes comment about low translucence (which may be misleading), but it's in the context of a stone that would be translucent if it was more dense. The non-translucents won't pass light no matter what.
That said, there's not a lot of hard stones on the market that are similar to Dan's true hard where they are not either black, gray trans or white trans.
-
08-05-2017, 06:52 PM #24
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459I don't know what the technical terms are, but I consider there to be a pretty big difference between cracking and inclusions. Norton seems to cut away even inclusions now (some of the old stones have them, but maybe they have been dropped or had stresses, who knows?). Dans will sell stones with inclusions from time to time, but they are sold as seconds, and I like those because the inclusions have no effect on use and the stones are still the same super fine as the rest of their finishers.
I used to be able to get seconds more cheaply, though, I think their seconds page has become more popular. The black in the first picture on this page is a second due to some coloration on the opposite side, but it was about a hundred bucks (a screaming steal). A trans that I had and then sold had a dot on the back side of it and they sold it for $90 (also 8x2x1). Those days are gone!
-
08-05-2017, 07:28 PM #25
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 2,224
Thanked: 481Well, in my case the corner was broken off. I presume that the split in the stone now is relative to whatever broke that piece off. But I wasn't there when it happened so it's a shot in the dark.
-
08-06-2017, 01:48 AM #26
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459Good God!
Vtg Norton Abrasives Hard Arkansas Oilstone HB8 Machinist Jewelers 8 x 2 x 1" | eBay
$286 for a stone that's been dropped. It's not even old. I was in on it up to about $65, and thought I might have a chance due to the damage!
-
08-06-2017, 02:21 AM #27
$268? Wow. Me thinks that was a fluke there Dave.
What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one
-
08-06-2017, 02:47 AM #28
-
08-06-2017, 04:54 AM #29
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Location
- indiana
- Posts
- 54
Thanked: 9I was following the same auction. Do cracks, let's say similar those in the pictures, prone to migrate easily? I could see that thing losing another big chunk with rough handling or temperature change.
-
08-10-2017, 06:36 PM #30
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 2,110
Thanked: 459If they're not loose, they can last a long time cracked like that. It's hard to tell if anything is loose without touching it, though.
If they're loose, they tend to break off. Otherwise, they're pretty stable and they don't creep along until the whole thing is delaminated like a sedimentary stone would (they probably do that due to wet and dry cycles, be it from direct water or humidity). There is no issue like that with an oilstone because the oil doesn't evaporate and it won't freeze.