View Poll Results: Highest Approximate Grit rating possible in your opinion..

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • 8k

    1 3.85%
  • 10k

    1 3.85%
  • 12k

    4 15.38%
  • 16k

    3 11.54%
  • 20k

    5 19.23%
  • 30k

    8 30.77%
  • 50k+

    4 15.38%
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
Like Tree90Likes

Thread: Natural Stones Approximate Grit

  1. #11
    Senior Member blabbermouth ScoutHikerDad's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Upstate South Carolina
    Posts
    3,308
    Thanked: 987

    Default

    Wow, Gssixgunn talking grit ratings on a natural is a switch, eh? Interesting theoretical topic, though. I went with 20k. But Steve, I gotta try one of these 30k JNat edges at some point. Lately I'm getting more and more into naturals, so I'm saving my pennies and watching here, Etsy and the Bay.

    Right now, I'm jonesin' real bad for 3 rocks: one of Keith Johnson's complete Shoubodani JNat kits (I've bought and sold a couple already), a nice full-sized Escher and a foot-long primitive cut SB or Trans Arkie. I mean like aircraft- carrier sized. I want one that's like the center piece of a coffee table-I mean those things are seriously cool, and relatively cheap compared to their full-dressed stones (referring to Dan's). And when I need a narrower Arkie, I can just use my 4x2 vintage Norton banded trans ark.

    And I'm still waiting on my Zulu while I play with TC's. I honestly think I'm more into hones now than the razors themselves!
    Last edited by ScoutHikerDad; 02-15-2020 at 11:30 PM.
    There are many roads to sharp.

  2. #12
    I used Nakayamas for my house mainaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    8,664
    Thanked: 2591
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Depending on the razor, the ones I have produce edges that feel similar to 16-20k range. I went with 20k.
    Stefan

  3. #13
    Senior Member Steve56's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,837
    Thanked: 508
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scipio View Post
    More comfortable does not always mean sharper.

    I am interested in this comment and the basis for it.
    My doorstop is a Nakayama

  4. #14
    Senior Member blabbermouth Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,321
    Thanked: 498

    Default

    So many different angles to go here. If we are talking actual grit size I don’t think they are that small. I think an Arkansas is around a 1200 grit equivalent but due to the binder (or lack there of) it can act like a much higher grit stone as it burnishes. How the stone cuts and how the cutting particles are arranged can also have a dramatic effect. Then you get into another ball park entirely when you talk about “friable” grit (if that’s ever been proven I don’t know). Or you can talk about the perceived edge you finish with and the shave result.

    For me, the perceived Edge’s of some of my thuringian and jnat edges have been over 12k and there is another difficulty- I don’t know that I can tell the difference between a 15k edge and a 16k or 20k edge for that matter. If I’m honest. I think I can but.....yeah.

    The shape of the edge, I believe, has a profound effect in the end too. A rounder (think splitting maul or apple seed) edge is much more comfortable but not necessarily more sharp. There’s another can o worms too.

    Of course this is only my current, imagined, subjective, opinion. I have very little objective scientific basis for any of it. So take it for what it’s worth.

    PS. I vote for 20k although it’s only a subjective guess.
    Last edited by Steel; 02-16-2020 at 02:59 AM.
    What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    283
    Thanked: 61

    Default

    Maybe sky is the limit, but I think we need to have the additional qualifier that there has to be cutting speed that is practical too. While cutting speed and grit are different, but to answer this question they kind of need to be considered together. What I mean is that no doubt there is some natural that is in the 30k or 50k range but just isn't practical to use because you'd be sitting there all day rubbing your razor back and forth. (I don't know what that stone would be, I'm just being speculative there).

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    283
    Thanked: 61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve56 View Post
    I am interested in this comment and the basis for it.
    Wouldn't the classic example of this be a coticule? While they don't typically get a razor as keen as any number of other hones (many synthetics, charnley forest, thurgians, etc), many people nonetheless prefer the edges because of how gentle and smooth they are.

  7. #17
    Skeptical Member Gasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    10,473
    Thanked: 2182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steel View Post
    So many different angles to go here. If we are talking actual grit size I don’t think they are that small. I think an Arkansas is around a 1200 grit equivalent but due to the binder (or lack there of) it can act like a much higher grit stone as it burnishes. How the stone cuts and how the cutting particles are arranged can also have a dramatic effect. Then you get into another ball park entirely when you talk about “friable” grit (if that’s ever been proven I don’t know). Or you can talk about the perceived edge you finish with and the shave result.

    For me, the perceived Edge’s of some of my thuringian and jnat edges have been over 12k and there is another difficulty- I don’t know that I can tell the difference between a 15k edge and a 16k or 20k edge for that matter. If I’m honest. I think I can but.....yeah.

    The shape of the edge, I believe, has a profound effect in the end too. A rounder (think splitting maul or apple seed) edge is much more comfortable but not necessarily more sharp. There’s another can o worms too.

    Of course this is only my current, imagined, subjective, opinion. I have very little objective scientific basis for any of it. So take it for what it’s worth.

    PS. I vote for 20k although it’s only a subjective guess.
    This ^^^^^^^
    It's just Sharpening, right?
    Jerry...

  8. #18
    www.edge-dynamics.com JOB15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,066
    Thanked: 512

    Default

    I found myself thinking about this question today.

    Any Japanese Natural Stone tests would have to be done with a diamond plate slurry because different Tomo Nagura raise or lower the grit level.

    Generally i find that fine finishing Jnats produce too sharp an edge with a diamond plate slurry which would put the grit ratings through the roof

  9. #19
    Senior Member kelbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Carolina
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 181

    Default

    Not currently able to offer my opinion but I do have a 12K Naniwa on the way for comparison with my Arkies and Thuris.
    ppetresen likes this.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    283
    Thanked: 61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kelbro View Post
    Not currently able to offer my opinion but I do have a 12K Naniwa on the way for comparison with my Arkies and Thuris.
    The trouble with comparing naturals is that even of the same kind there is considerable variance, not to mention that a preferred edge is fairly subjective. A 12k Naniwa should be a standard purchase for anyone getting in to honing since it at least offers a standard reference point to work from.
    Last edited by ppetresen; 02-17-2020 at 11:55 PM.
    ScoutHikerDad and 32t like this.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •