Results 1 to 10 of 36
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Finishing Hone ~ .5 Paste

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Lesslemming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    554
    Thanked: 197

    Default

    I´m sorry, but you know it says 0.92 microns, and not 92 microns on your stone?
    Even if it would say .95 microns, that would be just another way to write 0.95
    It is written on it. 0.92µm equals 0.92microns wich is less than one micron.
    0.9 is less than 1.0 and much less than 90...
    0.92 microns is not 92microns!
    What´s your point?

    The shapton 16k is rated at 0.94microns, wheras the Chroumim oxide is rated at 0.5microns and the Shapton 30k is rated at 0,49microns.
    Do you think 0.94microns means 94µm? No big deal if you do, I´m just saying you may be a little off track here

    For comparison sake here a picture of the 16k and 30k


    My pictures from a review for a german forum
    Along with your picture of the Chroimium oxide it looks like this:

    • Shapton 8k: 1.84 micron
    • Shapton 16k: 0,94 micron
    • Shapton 30k: 0,49 micron
    • Cr2O3: 0,5 micron



    Disclaimer:
    Again, for everyone who reads this at a later stage:
    I am not saying the shapton 30k is superior to 0,5µm Cr2O3,
    please read the pdf
    Last edited by Lesslemming; 04-03-2011 at 11:01 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member eleblu05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    baltimore md
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    oops i understand now thanks for the math lesson yeah i was reading it as 92. micron insted of .92 how i got off track is looking at the bottle it said 0.5-60,000 now i just dont see how that could be if the shapton is 30,000 and thats ,49 -30,000

  3. #3
    Senior Member Lesslemming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    554
    Thanked: 197

    Default

    I´m glad we figured that out

    Did you read my PDF file?
    If it´s too complicated I would be glad to help you, but I am (of course) asking you to try and understand it first
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4
    Senior Member eleblu05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    baltimore md
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    yes i read it i guess that would explain the bottle different grit ratings

  5. #5
    They call me Mr Bear. Stubear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Alton, UK
    Posts
    5,715
    Thanked: 1683
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I agree that you cant really compare a paste to a hone. An Escher is about 14k grit but the edge it gives is waaay better than paste IMHO. Coticules are 8-10k and I prefer a coticule edge to paste as well.

    Its really down to trying a load of stuff out and seeing what you prefer really! If I was going to use a paste it would be 0.5 CrOx and for finishing hones I'd use either my Nakayama Maruichi or Thuringian/Escher. I think its an Escher but its lost all but a tiny bit of the label so I have no idea! I like to tell myself that it is..!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •