Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Shaving Monk CJBianco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Greenville, SC USA
    Posts
    487
    Thanked: 75

    Default What is the perfect size coticule?

    I've been struggling with the idea that my new (vintage) monster coticule is more than enough for my simple tastes. Maybe it's the zen-taoist in me, but I feel almost guilty owning a stone this large (299mm x 67.5mm x 35mm, 4lbs 10oz) when a smaller stone might be just as good.

    So if you could own any size coticule, what is the perfect size? (It might come down to preferences of hand-honing versus bench-honing.)

    I'm thinking 8"x3" for bench-honing and 6"x2" for hand-honing...maybe?

    Thanx,
    Christopher

  2. #2
    I shave with a spoon on a stick. Slartibartfast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stay away stalker!
    Posts
    4,578
    Thanked: 1262
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I have had a couple, the size I preferred was the one that was 7"x1.75"

  3. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth hi_bud_gl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,521
    Thanked: 1636

    Default

    Largest size hones are very hard to find .
    what size you would like ?
    You are the only person can answer to that question.
    The reason for it because it depends.
    Some people like 5x2 keep it inside their hand.
    some 7x1.5
    some 8x3
    everything depends the persons preferences

  4. #4
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Chris, I have to be honest with you. I have run many tests and measurements and found that for my anatomical characteristics and honing style, the absolute perfect dream size coticule for me would be 299mm x 67.5mm x 35mm, 4lbs 10oz. If you happen across one, do let me know

    Seriously though I like 8 x 2 for hand honing. I haven't found a size I like for bench honing. Maybe I just don't like bench honing
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    32,564
    Thanked: 11042

    Default

    I honestly haven't figured that out yet. I go from long to short to wide to narrow and I seem to like them all.
    Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.

  6. #6
    They call me Mr Bear. Stubear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Alton, UK
    Posts
    5,715
    Thanked: 1683
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I always hone by hand, and I can hold my 8"x3" Shaptons and Naniwas (with bases), or my 10"x2.5" Charnley Forest (which is on a big wooden base) in my hands. Just not all at the same time lol..!

    Then again, I have big hands..!

    My coti/BBW combo is actually quite small though. Its 6"x2", and I almost find it a little bit too small..!

    But to answer your question, the only thing to ensure is that you can get a good even coverage on the blade with your stone. You dont want it so small that its hard to keep the razor flat, and you dont want it so big that its like trying to hone on a paving slab. Other than that, its really personal preference..!

  7. #7
    Shaving Monk CJBianco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Greenville, SC USA
    Posts
    487
    Thanked: 75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoglahoo View Post
    Chris, I have to be honest with you. I have run many tests and measurements and found that for my anatomical characteristics and honing style, the absolute perfect dream size coticule for me would be 299mm x 67.5mm x 35mm, 4lbs 10oz.
    LOL Personally, I'm thinking my perfect dream size might be 8x2.5 (the same width as my TM latigo), but I think coticules usually come in 8x2 or 8x3, so I may have to choose.

    Hmm...


    Me

  8. #8
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,430
    Thanked: 3918
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    1.5"x7"-8"

  9. #9
    Senior Member kevint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanked: 285

    Default

    Every stone I have is the perfect size regardless of dimensions.

    If it were not true I am sure they would have come to me differently. Why else would they continually become (nearly imperceptibly) thinner?

    This is certainly not meant to exclude any that have since been resawn; even though saying I have done so seems to contradict my earlier statement. it does not.

  10. #10
    Large Member ben.mid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire, England
    Posts
    3,096
    Thanked: 763

    Default

    To be honest, I'd like yours! What a rock.
    A more useful size in my opinion would be 250 x 38mm (10"x1.5") Narrow enough to deal with more awkward blades, but long enough to cut down on laps a little.
    I'd still like yours though.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •