Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: Those Boring Ole Shapton GS hones

  1. #31
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Roseville,Kali
    Posts
    10,432
    Thanked: 2027

    Default

    How do the GS shaptons differ from the shapton pros? or do they?
    My pre finisher is a 12K pro,a great stone.

  2. #32
      Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    8,454
    Thanked: 4941
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    To me, the Pro's were a little more grainy feeling and not as consistent as the glass stones. YMMV for sure. I had a set and got rid of them years ago. Some of the guys liked them.

    Quote Originally Posted by pixelfixed View Post
    How do the GS shaptons differ from the shapton pros? or do they?
    My pre finisher is a 12K pro,a great stone.
    pixelfixed likes this.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:

    pixelfixed (07-31-2013)

  4. #33
    The Great & Powerful Oz onimaru55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bodalla, NSW
    Posts
    15,597
    Thanked: 3748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pixelfixed View Post
    How do the GS shaptons differ from the shapton pros? or do they?
    My pre finisher is a 12K pro,a great stone.
    The Pros are really fast cutters with carbon steel & no slouch with stainless. Almost DMT aggressive & as a result I think they are not the ideal for everybody. Same as the DMT's you must not press hard or they gouge the bevel especially at the low grits. The 220 grit Pro should not go anywhere near a razor.
    I agree with Lynn they are not as consistent as the GS but I've always compensated by finishing with Jnats. Since I bought my 20k Suehiro & tried straight synthetic progressions my hit rate is not as high but I'll work that out.
    I found the graininess in the 8k & 12k at first but it seemed to lap out ok. I'm not sure if the Pro's are harder than the GS but I seem to lap them much less.

    The white GS were designed for use with A2 tool steel but work a treat with razors. The composition is really homogenous & they 'seem' a tad softer & slower giving a really nice polish. Mind you 'soft' doesn't mean they wear fast , just a cf. to the Pros

    Then you have the grey GS designed for Carbon steel but I only ever had one of those in 220 grit. It was ok for restoration purposes with a healthy slurry but the 320 Pro just eats steel & starts the bevel much quicker on nightmare razors.


    tl;dr
    Pros are fast & aggressive ~ great for restoring
    GS are smooth & consistent ~ great for everyone
    “The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.”

  5. #34
    50 year str. shaver mrsell63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pothole County, PA
    Posts
    2,258
    Thanked: 522
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Shapton Glass has my vote hands down. Wouldn't trade them for anything. 1k/4k/8k/16k
    Suile likes this.
    JERRY
    OOOPS! Pass the styptic please.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •