Results 1 to 10 of 132
Thread: How to use Coticule.
Threaded View
-
11-12-2010, 03:06 AM #11
Sorry, my photos aren't turning out very good.
I will try to asnwer your original question, which as a learning experience I thought I'd try.
No, i personaly have not read of it in historical context. Isn't that trying to prove a negative though? I believe that the use of slurries isn'yt unheard of nor do I find it unlikely that it could have been used. I'll galdy concede the point though.
Yes, at least that has been my experience. Both in the past, and tonight with my honest effort to give your suggestion a shot.
? typo?
It's a tool. I use 'em all the time. They all wear out. In spite of the the coming price hikes, I'm fully prepared to buy another stone. If it was a $500.00 escher, I'd still use the bloody thing.
This is exactly the opposite of what i found.
I tried quick again to get a slurry build-up on the stone, it took well over 5 sets of 20 half strokes, (100) to build up enough to be plainly visible. Under the lighting conditons i have and my poor photographic skills, my photo look like nothing. And yet another hundred as i type this still hasn't brought the edge back to SAH though there is some grey showing now.
The thought occurs to me that I may not be using the term slurry apropriatley. i make a distinction between swarf and slurry. Swarf is what I consider waste steel in the water, which is what I would call the result after 200 strokes on my stone with water.
I think of slurry as a mixture of water and an abrasive medium. I wasn't getting any abrasive material with water alone, so i'd be more correct to say that I see a build up of swarf.Last edited by wdwrx; 11-12-2010 at 03:13 AM. Reason: left out a sentence
-