Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    The Electrochemist PhatMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hastings, UK
    Posts
    1,714
    Thanked: 527

    Default

    Loric,

    Could you please post some details on how you flattened/lapped your Spyderco UF ? I was thinking about doing one side of mine.

    Many thanks !

    Have fun !

    Best regards

    Russ

  2. #22
    Junior Member Loric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15
    Thanked: 3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhatMan View Post
    Loric,

    Could you please post some details on how you flattened/lapped your Spyderco UF ? I was thinking about doing one side of mine.

    Many thanks !

    Have fun !

    Best regards

    Russ
    I'd be happy too. This was all flying by the seat of my pants as it was honestly the first stone I ever flattened. What works best for me was to draw your pencil marks on the Spyderco UF and wetting down the SUF and a DMT XXC and rubbing the XXC over the SUF. Slurry builds up fast, and clogs up the XXC so rinse this away as soon as you notice it. It wont look like much, but the more often you wash it off the faster the whole posses will go. The slurry will eventually wear the pencil marks off before the stone is flat, so assume you will have to re apply them at least once. It should be easy to tell what areas are being lapped off and what areas are just fading from the friction, but its an important thing to note.

    After the XXC I could see and feel scratch marks so I did a touch up with my DMT XC and then C and it feels smooth and flat now. Though I'm not an expert and it could take a bit more to really polish it up. However the edges I get off of it are much much better now than before I lapped it. My particular SUF had these awful ridges from the factory lapping posses. Even as a novice I could feel the razor moving as it passed over them.

    Both sides were similarly un-flat on my Spyderco and on the first I attempted to do as others suggested with the stones in a sink with water running over them. For me this went much much slower (3 hours as apposed to 75 min) as I dont think the slurry was washed away nearly as efficiently. I still made sure that both stones were always wet, and in fact washing the slurry away so often really prevented anything from drying out.

    I hope that helps, let me know if I can clear anything else up. Just remember that even with good tools this will take ALOT of time.
    Last edited by Loric; 02-06-2011 at 06:26 PM.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Loric For This Useful Post:

    PhatMan (02-07-2011)

  4. #23
    Scale Maniac BKratchmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Decorah, IA
    Posts
    2,671
    Thanked: 641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loric View Post
    I'd be happy too. This was all flying by the seat of my pants as it was honestly the first stone I ever flattened. What works best for me was to draw your pencil marks on the Spyderco UF and wetting down the SUF and a DMT XXC and rubbing the XXC over the SUF. Slurry builds up fast, and clogs up the XXC so rinse this away as soon as you notice it. It wont look like much, but the more often you wash it off the faster the whole posses will go. The slurry will eventually wear the pencil marks off before the stone is flat, so assume you will have to re apply them at least once. It should be easy to tell what areas are being lapped off and what areas are just fading from the friction, but its an important thing to note.

    After the XXC I could see and feel scratch marks so I did a touch up with my DMT XC and then C and it feels smooth and flat now. Though I'm not an expert and it could take a bit more to really polish it up. However the edges I get off of it are much much better now.

    Both sides were similarly un-flat on my Spyderco and on the first I attempted to do as others suggested with the stones in a sink with water running over them. For me this went much much slower (3 hours as apposed to 75 min) as I dont think the slurry was washed away nearly as efficiently. I still made sure that both stones were always wet, and in fact washing the slurry away so often really prevented anything from drying out.

    I hope that helps, let me know if I can clear anything else up. Just remember that even with good tools this will take ALOT of time.

    A Spyderco is a great way to ruin a DMT. Just sayin'.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to BKratchmer For This Useful Post:

    PhatMan (02-07-2011)

  6. #24
    The Electrochemist PhatMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hastings, UK
    Posts
    1,714
    Thanked: 527

    Default

    Loric,

    Many thanks for the gen

    Luckily, my Spyderco UF is reasonably flat. I was looking to remove the 'grooving' on one side as I have heard some good things about lapped UFs.

    Benjamin - many thanks for the warning !

    Have fun !

    Best regards

    Russ

  7. #25
    Senior Member jeness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    797
    Thanked: 219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BKratchmer View Post
    A Spyderco is a great way to ruin a DMT. Just sayin'.
    If you do things right, than no. You should be fine if you only use minimal pressure and much water.

  8. #26
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If you flatten your Spyderco hone, you RUIN your Spydero hone. The hone is guaranteed to be flat. If you find that it is not, then exchange it for one that is. Never lap a Spyderco hone.

    If by flat, you mean smooth, then that is another issue and it cannot be corrected by lapping. The Spyderco hone achieves its cutting capacity by those swirl marks that the factory has lapped into the hones. This is why the Spyderco F and UF are made of exactly the same material. Their only difference is created by the factory lapping.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:

    Evritt (02-16-2011), PhatMan (02-14-2011)

  10. #27
    Junior Member Loric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15
    Thanked: 3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Utopian View Post
    If you flatten your Spyderco hone, you RUIN your Spydero hone. The hone is guaranteed to be flat. If you find that it is not, then exchange it for one that is. Never lap a Spyderco hone.

    If by flat, you mean smooth, then that is another issue and it cannot be corrected by lapping. The Spyderco hone achieves its cutting capacity by those swirl marks that the factory has lapped into the hones. This is why the Spyderco F and UF are made of exactly the same material. Their only difference is created by the factory lapping.
    I dont think its ruined, it still removes some metal, and does a nice job polishing. Did it remove more metal before I smoothed it, yes. However, I guess I was looking for a final polishing hone rather than something to go to right after my DMT EE. I'm still figuring things out, but for me the edge feels keener after the UF than it does straight off my Coticule, YMMV.

    Signed the (apparently) reckless honer.

  11. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    608
    Thanked: 124

    Default

    Spyderco UFs are great, but I think its best to think of them as polishers, that they improve the edges from other hones. They do sharpen, but they're really slow.

    I lapped mine on a DMT 225. Both hones survived and recovered fine, though they still have problems looking each other in the eye. I prefer the surface of the lapped UF, I think it puts a smoother finish on.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •